Hi,
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:14:54PM -0700, Brian Buhrow wrote:
> hello. I'm not saying anything that anyone here doesn't already know,
> but I'll add that Linux seems to have taken the position that all ethernet
> interfaces should be called eth0, eth1, etc.
This argument surprises me
hello. I'm not saying anything that anyone here doesn't already know,
but I'll add that Linux seems to have taken the position that all ethernet
interfaces should be called eth0, eth1, etc. This is fine as far as it
goes, but when you have to start figuring which physical hardware goes wit
Please read _*all*_ the answers, because I've already said that I was fine
with keeping COMPAT_ULTRIX. If someone has been able to even run a full
ULTRIX userland, then it's probably functional enough, and we can keep it
for the time being. Case closed.
On Mar 10, 12:16pm, Maxime Villard wrote:
} Le 10/03/2019 à 11:25, Björn Johannesson a écrit :
} >
} > COMPAT_ULTRIX (mips) works fine which I recently discovered after shuffling
} > some disks and NetBSD8 mounted the ULTRIX disk as /
}
} This more likely means that it was an old UFS disk that
> On Mar 10, 2019, at 9:52 AM, Jason Thorpe wrote:
>
>> This more likely means that it was an old UFS disk that we do support by
>> default in our UFS/FFS code, but I hardly see how this could be related to
>> COMPAT_ULTRIX.
>
> No, I'm sure he actually means an old Ultrix disk. Doing that s
> On Mar 10, 2019, at 4:16 AM, Maxime Villard wrote:
>
> Le 10/03/2019 à 11:25, Björn Johannesson a écrit :
>> Hello.
>>
>> COMPAT_ULTRIX (mips) works fine which I recently discovered after shuffling
>> some disks and NetBSD8 mounted the ULTRIX disk as /
>
> This more likely means that it wa
Le 10/03/2019 à 13:30, Björn Johannesson a écrit :
>This more likely means that it was an old UFS disk that we do support by
>default in our UFS/FFS code, but I hardly seehow this could be related to
COMPAT_ULTRIX.
What I meant was that it mounted the ULTRIX root disk and proceeded to run in
Hello.
COMPAT_ULTRIX (mips) works fine which I recently discovered after shuffling
some disks
and NetBSD8 mounted the ULTRIX disk as /
Not that I have terribly much use for it (except maybe maple) but I would still
like it to be kept in.
/B
Hello.
On Sun, 3/10/19, Maxime Villard wrote:
Subject: Re: Regarding the ULTRIX and OSF1 compats
To: "Björn Johannesson" , tech-kern@netbsd.org
Cc: port-p...@netbsd.org, port-al...@netbsd.org
Date: Sunday, March 10, 2019, 12:16 PM
Le 10/03/2019
Le 10/03/2019 à 11:25, Björn Johannesson a écrit :
Hello.
COMPAT_ULTRIX (mips) works fine which I recently discovered after shuffling
some disks and NetBSD8 mounted the ULTRIX disk as /
This more likely means that it was an old UFS disk that we do support by
default in our UFS/FFS code, but I
Le 09/03/2019 à 18:58, Jason Thorpe a écrit :
On Mar 9, 2019, at 8:22 AM, Maxime Villard wrote:
New thread, CC'ed to port-pmax@ and port-alpha@, in the continuity of:
https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2019/03/09/msg024754.html
Basically, there were talks about retiring COMPAT_ULT
11 matches
Mail list logo
