On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 10:14:48PM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> I have no opinion here, just please do the right thing. Unless there are
> any shortcomings it would be nice to follow closely C11.
There are plenty of shortcomings in C11. We should concentrate on
abstractions that are correct
Le 06/11/2019 à 23:41, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius a écrit :
Maxime Villard wrote:
- If we do not want to stick with the C11 API (its emulation), then I
would suggest to use the similar terminology, e.g. atomic_load_relaxed()
and atomic_store_relaxed(), or Linux READ_ONCE()/WRITE_ONCE(). There is
