Hi Taylor/Ozaki-san/NetBSD developers,
I'm very excited that NetBSD is enthusiastic about WireGuard. Having
more deployment of WireGuard is always great to hear. And NetBSD is
really a terrific project. I've been enthusiastic about using it for
rump kernels for many years, and adding WireGuard cap
[followups to tech-net to reduce cross-posting noise]
Hi, Jason!
Sorry about not reaching out. The history is that the code has been
kicking around the NetBSD world since Ozaki-san first wrote it in
2018, without getting merged into src. It felt a shame to let it
wallow in that state indefinite
> On Aug 22, 2020, at 11:35 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> it needs to be done right,
Can you be specific about what is wrong?
-- thorpej
On Sat 15 Aug 2020 at 19:57:26 -0400, Terry Moore wrote:
> David Holland wrote:
> >> I would say so, especially since that would mean the child's parent is
> > > no longer the process that forked it (which could break other use
> >> cases).
> >
> > That depends on how you implement detaching, but
