On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 08:58:36AM +0900, Rin Okuyama wrote:
> I'm also one who feels hesitate to import Linux'ism into our basic
> components. However, for this problem in particular, I still think
> it is not a good choice to keep NetBSD support in driver-aarch64.c:
>
> (a) Our sysctl(3)-based i
Hi,
(tech-toolchain@ added to cc)
On 2020/10/16 1:49, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 15.10.2020 17:14, Rin Okuyama wrote:
On 2020/10/15 16:12, matthew green wrote:
Martin Husemann writes:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 05:28:12PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
you could try reverting most of our changes t
hello,
As a background, some Linux binaries don't claim to be targeting the
Linux OS, but instead are "SYSV".
We have used some heuristics to still identify those binaries as being
Linux binaries, like looking into the symbols defined by the binary.
it looks like we no longer have other forms of
co...@sdf.org writes:
> As a background, some Linux binaries don't claim to be targeting the
> Linux OS, but instead are "SYSV".
>
> We have used some heuristics to still identify those binaries as being
> Linux binaries, like looking into the symbols defined by the binary.
>
> it looks like we n
