Brian Buhrow wrote:
> hello. I wonder if you've compared your BIOS settings on both
> machines? While the BIOS may be the same version, it's possible the
> settings are not identical. this is strongly suggested by the fact that
> one of your machines shows a serial number in its machdep.
hello. I wonder if you've compared your BIOS settings on both
machines? While the BIOS
may be the same version, it's possible the settings are not identical. this is
strongly
suggested by the fact that one of your machines shows a serial number in its
machdep.dmi
output, while the oth
Michael van Elst wrote:
> As for performance, the common issue was that the ACPI interrupt
> isn't handled and you get several thousand interrupts per second
> that slow down everything.
You spot it:
glutamine# vmstat -iv
interrupt total rate
TLB shootdown 135950
cpu0 timer
m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) writes:
>Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>> Have you compared the machdep sysctl?
>Here it is.
>+machdep.dmi.system-serial = 0123456789
>+machdep.dmi.system-uuid = ----ac1f6b747c48
The serial numbers are only shown to root.
As for performance
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> Have you compared the machdep sysctl?
Here it is.
--- sysctl.glutamine
+++ sysctl.leucine
@@ -660,9 +660,9 @@
hw.wd1.use_ncq_prio = 0
machdep.biosbasemem = 611
machdep.biosextmem = 1047552
machdep.booted_kernel = /netbsd
-machdep.diskinfo: 80:30031872(845/255/63
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 11:46:21AM +0100, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> I just got two identical machines, let us call them glutamine and leucine. I
> run ffmpeg4 to transcode H264 video to webm, and leucine is about 12 times
> faster than glutamine.
Have you compared the machdep sysctl?
Joerg
Hello
I just got two identical machines, let us call them glutamine and leucine. I
run ffmpeg4 to transcode H264 video to webm, and leucine is about 12 times
faster than glutamine.
The hardware and software are the same, the BIOS revision are identical. The
only difference dmesg tells me about be
