On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 12:47:53 +1100, Luke Mewburn wrote:
> The "extsrc/" tree was added in late 2009.
> Nothing in tree uses "extsrc/"; it's a placeholder for third-party
> vendors to hook into the build for their own extensions.
> There's no reason a vendor can't just integrate into the build
I propose that we deprecate or remove the "extsrc/" tree,
as the name name-complete conflicts with "external/".
The "external/" tree was added in mid 2008.
A lot of the in-tree third-party source is now in this tree,
and developers need to traverse this tree a lot.
The "extsrc/" tree was added in
On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 05:52:54PM -0500, Michael Pratt wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 1:06 PM Michael Pratt wrote:
> >
> > [This is a reply to
> > https://mail-index.netbsd.org/tech-kern/2021/12/01/msg027830.html. I
> > just joined the mailing list and can't seem to find the metadata
> > requir
