> On 9. Mar 2022, at 02:22, matthew green wrote:
>
> matthew green writes:
>> "J. Hannken-Illjes" writes:
>>> I'm now able to reproduce it here -- takes about six hours to trigger.
>>>
>>> I suppose vrelel() lost a check for new references with my last changes,
>>> currently testing the diff att
Hello tech-kern,
I'm discorvering the article about language-neutral-interfaces for
system calls.
http://wiki.netbsd.org/projects/project/language-neutral-interfaces/
That is a very interesting topic.
IMHO scheme language is well suited to answer the issue.
Are you interested in more discus
> On Mar 9, 2022, at 5:18 AM, jo...@nonadev.net wrote:
>
> Hello tech-kern,
>
> I'm discorvering the article about language-neutral-interfaces for system
> calls.
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://wiki.netbsd.org/projects/project/language-neutral-interfaces/__;!!LpKI!yl7D58zoWsSSbdJtiN2
>> I'm discorvering the article about language-neutral-interfaces for
>> system calls.
>> [...]
>> IMHO scheme language is well suited to answer the issue.
> As for Scheme, I thought that's a programming language, and a rather
> exotic one at that.
Not all that exotic. AIUI it's just a Lisp diale
http://wiki.netbsd.org/projects/project/valgrind/ sketches a project
for porting valgrind, but gives tech-kern as its contact address.
Surely that's not right?
In passing, the difficulty will vary, substantially I expect, with the
port(s) it's targeted for. I spent a while trying to implement
val
