At Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:47:55 +, "Koning, Paul" wrote:
Subject: Re: pcc [was Re: valgrind]
>
>
> Out of curiosity: how does PCC code quality compare with that of
> GCC and (for targets that it supports) Clang?
Heh. I would say PCC's generated code doesn't compare to either modern
GCC or LLVM/
Den 2022-03-23 kl. 19:37, skrev Greg A. Woods:
At Tue, 22 Mar 2022 17:47:55 +, "Koning, Paul" wrote:
Subject: Re: pcc [was Re: valgrind]
Out of curiosity: how does PCC code quality compare with that of
GCC and (for targets that it supports) Clang?
Heh. I would say PCC's generated code do
At Wed, 23 Mar 2022 20:56:27 +0100, Anders Magnusson
wrote:
Subject: Re: pcc [was Re: valgrind]
>
> Den 2022-03-23 kl. 19:37, skrev Greg A. Woods:
> >
> > Heh. I would say PCC's generated code doesn't compare to either modern
> > GCC or LLVM/Clang's output.
> >
> > I would say the main reason is
Den 2022-03-23 kl. 21:55, skrev Greg A. Woods:
At Wed, 23 Mar 2022 20:56:27 +0100, Anders Magnusson
wrote:
Subject: Re: pcc [was Re: valgrind]
Den 2022-03-23 kl. 19:37, skrev Greg A. Woods:
Heh. I would say PCC's generated code doesn't compare to either modern
GCC or LLVM/Clang's output.
I
