Hello,
Le Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 04:59:19PM +0100, Martin Husemann a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 02:56:47PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> > no data for est. mode 640x480x67
>
> [..]
>
> > I have not updated the book blocks. Is the 10.0 kernel expecting to have
> > hints about the mode
Date:Sun, 22 Jan 2023 20:27:24 +0100
From:tlaro...@polynum.com
Message-ID:
| +Zone kernel: Available graphics memory: 9007199254079374 KiB
I see something like that too, but while it is obviously absurd,
I'm not sure that it actually does any harm (maybe) - my sy
Le Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 02:56:47PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com a écrit :
> [...]
>
> The main difference is about the framebuffer: previous kernel version
> picked the correct mode. NetBSD 10.0 does not and use "entry level"
> mode 640x480x67, resulting streched fat big characters; message:
>
> n
Taylor R Campbell writes:
> Try the attached patch?
Thanks... I will test it as soon as I am able to.
--
Brad Spencer - b...@anduin.eldar.org - KC8VKS - http://anduin.eldar.org
Try the attached patch?
>From 89b144a95e698df4a844157c55b70cef488548ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Taylor R Campbell
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2023 15:56:55 +
Subject: [PATCH] npf(9): Don't hold table lock across copyout.
Instead, block npf_table_gc during copyout of anything that might be
GC'd, s
On Sun, Jan 22, 2023 at 02:56:47PM +0100, tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> no data for est. mode 640x480x67
[..]
> I have not updated the book blocks. Is the 10.0 kernel expecting to have
> hints about the modes from the bootloader i.e. a new install would
> have updated the boot blocks and I would
[Please feel free to redirect me to another list if this is not the
correct one for kernel beta testing]
Context: I'm testing NetBSD 10.0 BETA on an isolated node (not
production). Only kernel and modules (not userland); and kernel is not
GENERIC but a special config one matching the previous 9.2
