On 2023-12-25 02:17, Robert Elz wrote:
Date:Sun, 24 Dec 2023 13:49:53 +0100
From:Johnny Billquist
Message-ID:
| In my opinion, all of these POSIX calls that take a time argument should
| really have been done the same as clock_gettime(), in that you specif
On Mon, 2023-12-25 00:26:34 +0100, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> But I think the suggestion that the time adjustment might actually be a
> source of the problem is interesting, and should be investigated. It just
> takes so bloody long to do a full build these days. I still haven't
> finished, and can
On Sunday, December 24, 2023 at 02:43:55 AM PST, Johnny Billquist
wrote:
> Oh? So we are actually not POSIX compliant on that one? Interesting.
> (POSIX explicitly says that the timeout should be for an absolute time,
> which means that if you for example update the clock, moving it
> backwar
