>> Here's what ACPI has to say. As I mentioned, dmesg is identical
>> with or without the card.
> There are devices out there that require a relatively recent host (
> '3rd generation PCIE' or somesuch ).
I am inclined to doubt that's what's up here. The Q1900M fails; the
one that works is an As
Hello,
On Thu, 3 Oct 2024 11:27:26 -0400 (EDT)
Mouse wrote:
> Here's what ACPI has to say. As I mentioned, dmesg is identical with
> or without the card.
There are devices out there that require a relatively recent host (
'3rd generation PCIE' or somesuch ). I've seen this on a PCIe powermac
-
>> It's supposed to negotiate down to x1?
> Yes.
Okay. I've dropped the manufacturer an email asking whether this
device is supposed to work in a mechanically x16 slot which has only
one lane available to it.
The primary chip on the board is indeed marked with the JMicron logo
and "JMB585" (it's
mo...@rodents-montreal.org (Mouse) writes:
>It's supposed to negotiate down to x1?
Yes.
> Then either Vantec or ASRock
>has done something odd or my particular Q1900M has a duff "x16" slot,
>because it doesn't work.
I once had a PCIe network card in a x16 slot that didn't work reliable
and wasn
>> ahcisata0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0: vendor 0x197b product 0x0585
> That's a JMicron JMB585 which has a PCIe Gen3 x2 interface and
> provides five 6Gbps SATA ports.
That sounds right; the card has five SATA connectors and its ppb
reports "link is x2 @ 5.0GT/s".
> If your board has eight SATA po
>>> [...] a 5-port PCIe SATA card [...]
>> In case it matters to anyone, the card is identified, on the box and
>> on a sticker on the card itself, as a UGT-ST655, and it comes from
>> Vantec. As one of my messages quoted autoconf as saying, it shows
>> up as vendor 0x197b product 0x0585.
> [T]he
mo...@rodents-montreal.org (Mouse) writes:
>ahcisata0 at pci2 dev 0 function 0: vendor 0x197b product 0x0585
That's a JMicron JMB585 which has a PCIe Gen3 x2 interface and
provides five 6Gbps SATA ports. If your board has eight SATA
ports, then one of the SATA ports probably has an additional
1-t
This used to be my day job, but I'm only good at doing this on Linux.
Looking at the ids on the pciids database, you have a JMB58x AHCI SATA
controller. I'm not sure if that helps or not, but the next step for me
would be to dive into output of lspci and what the registers there say.
And I think
> [...]. I just today picked up a 5-port PCIe SATA card and tried it.
In case it matters to anyone, the card is identified, on the box and on
a sticker on the card itself, as a UGT-ST655, and it comes from Vantec.
As one of my messages quoted autoconf as saying, it shows up as vendor
0x197b produ
>> If you're plugging in a card and it isn't seen, I'd check the BIOS
>> and look for any pcie settings it might have.
> I suspect it's worse than that in this case; see mlelstv's mail,
> explaining that there are only four lanes available total, so my
> "x16" slot is [actually x1 electrically]
I
Date:Thu, 3 Oct 2024 01:13:52 -0400 (EDT)
From:Mouse
Message-ID: <202410030513.baa08...@stone.rodents-montreal.org>
| One of these machines is an ASRock Q1900M. It has only two SATA ports
| onboard; it has two PCIe x1 slots and a PCIe x16 slot. I just today
|
First, my thanks to everyone; while the news is not great from the
perspective of getting things working, it has greatly improved my
understanding of PCIe, so in that sense it was a success. You people
are a marvelous resource!
> It's been my experience that pcie busses show up as pci busses from
hello. It's been my experience that pcie busses show up as pci busses
from the software
perspective and, as you note, simply have more capabilities than standard pci
connections. If
you're plugging in a card and it isn't seen, I'd check the BIOS and look for
any pcie settings
it might
> Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 10:13:17 +0200
> From: "J. Hannken-Illjes"
>
> > On 1. Oct 2024, at 18:57, Taylor R Campbell
> > wrote:
> >
> > I think the answer is no, nothing here precludes a concurrent
> > vcache_reclaim from writing to fp->f_vnode->v_mount at the same time
> > do_sys_fstatvfs is
mo...@rodents-montreal.org (Mouse) writes:
>I note a possible conflict between the "x1" and the presence of a x16
>slot; that 1 is coming from the PCIE_LCAP_MAX_WIDTH bits in PCIE_LCAP,
>which makes me wonder whether something needs configuring to run the
>x16 slot at more than x1. The card does
> On 1. Oct 2024, at 18:57, Taylor R Campbell
> wrote:
>
> Under what circumstances is access to struct vnode::v_mount allowed?
>
> A vnode may be concurrently revoked at any time. Part of revoking a
> vnode vp, in vcache_reclaim, involves vfs_insmntque to set vp->v_mount
> to dead_rootmount.
16 matches
Mail list logo