On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 09:05:20PM +, Christos Zoulas wrote:
>> In article <4ff09c68.6000...@gmail.com>,
>> Adam Hoka wrote:
>> >
>> >I plan to commit this if there are no good reason
On 6/26/2012 8:12 PM, Adam Hoka wrote:
> On 6/24/2012 10:23 AM, Adam Hoka wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Can you guys please check if the following makes sense:
>>
>> http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/timebackwards.diff
>>
>> The use case is the following
On 6/24/2012 10:23 AM, Adam Hoka wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Can you guys please check if the following makes sense:
>
> http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/timebackwards.diff
>
> The use case is the following:
>
> After starting NetBSD in vmware I see a lot of RL
On 6/24/2012 5:13 PM, Jean-Yves Migeon wrote:
> On 24.06.2012 10:23, Adam Hoka wrote:
>> After starting NetBSD in vmware I see a lot of RLIMIT_CPU reached
>> messages overflowing my dmesg. At some time during the boot one or more
>> processes calculate a negative runtime,
On 6/24/2012 5:00 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <4fe6ce73.70...@gmail.com>, Adam Hoka wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> Can you guys please check if the following makes sense:
>>
>> http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/timebackwards.diff
>>
Hi!
Can you guys please check if the following makes sense:
http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/timebackwards.diff
The use case is the following:
After starting NetBSD in vmware I see a lot of RLIMIT_CPU reached
messages overflowing my dmesg. At some time during the boot one or more
processes
On 2/23/2012 7:34 PM, David Young wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 07:58:11AM +, David Holland wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 08:17:15AM -0600, David Young wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 01:42:45PM +0100, Manuel Wiesinger wrote:
>> > > *)
>> > > What is it good for? The only practica
On 12/27/2011 7:59 PM, Michael wrote:
> Hello,
>
> some of you probably noticed a bunch of commits in rasops, wscons etc.
> regarding support for anti-aliased fonts in the console. There are three
> drivers which support this so far:
> - genfb, if it finds a 32bit framebuffer
> - ffb
> - voyager
On 12/27/2011 7:59 PM, Michael wrote:
> Hello,
>
> some of you probably noticed a bunch of commits in rasops, wscons etc.
> regarding support for anti-aliased fonts in the console. There are three
> drivers which support this so far:
> - genfb, if it finds a 32bit framebuffer
> - ffb
> - voyager
On 12/1/2011 5:33 PM, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> Matthew Dillon implemented a solution for USB/graphics cards problem
> stemming from the fact that some time after the boot, they can't
> acquire enough contiguous memory.
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.dragonfly-bsd.kernel/14431
>
> Anyone int
On 11/23/2011 6:03 PM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> In article <46DA345771B043F283B5E67C674DAA76@desktop>,
> Adam Hoka wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> If no one argues otherwise, I would like to import chewiefs to the NetBSD
>> tree.
>>
>> The import would have
Hi!
If no one argues otherwise, I would like to import chewiefs to the NetBSD
tree.
The import would have minimal impact on existing code, but would allow for
broader testing of the code and a step towards a more embedded ready NetBSD.
Cheers.
It's not for SSD, but for raw flash device often found in embedded
systems, like ARM, MIPS.
On Sun, 7 Aug 2011 18:04:43 +0200
m...@netbsd.org (Emmanuel Dreyfus) wrote:
> Mouse wrote:
>
> > Personally? I'd say that scheduling it should be done by userland, but
> > that putting the actual removal in the filesystem makes sense.
>
> Yes, a TTL attribute on an inode: once it expires, the
On Tue, 2 Aug 2011 13:08:55 -0500
wrote:
> Gentlepeople,
>
> Some file systems use genfs_compat_getpages while others (most of them) use
> genfs_getpages. I'm trying to figure out the essential differences, and why
> one would pick one over the other.
>
> Any pointers?
>
>pa
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:44:06 -0400
Greg Troxel wrote:
>
> Anyone knows what is the etimology for softc?
> What does it mean? Where does it come from? When was it first used?
>
> In PDP-11 context, CSR means "control and status register". Often there
> was an address (for a 16-bit word) tha
Hi!
Anyone knows what is the etimology for softc?
What does it mean? Where does it come from? When was it first used?
--
NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 19:05:14 +0200
gilbert.fernan...@orange.fr wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:59:37AM +0200, Rhialto wrote:
>
> > That must be very rare! Nobody in their right mind uses a Dutch
> > keyboard. And I say that as a Dutch person.
>
> They are. I know the Dutch have moved to usin
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 14:49:32 +
David Holland wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 09:37:33AM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 08:00:18AM +, David Holland wrote:
> > >
> > > Other fses with their own rename implementations whose locking is
> > > clearly wrong
On Tue, 31 May 2011 22:15:36 +0100
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Unless anyone objects, I will merge rmind-uvmplock branch. The technical
> objectives of the branch are described here:
>
> http://nxr.netbsd.org/xref/src/doc/BRANCHES?r=1.307#488
>
> This results in:
>
> - Rewrit
On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:00:38 +
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> Adam Hoka wrote:
> > Latest update: http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/flash_9.diff
> >
> > I will commit this in the following days if there are no other
> > suggestions.
>
> - Why ha
Latest update: http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/flash_9.diff
I will commit this in the following days if there are no other
suggestions.
Thanks.
--
NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability
On 14 Feb 2011 18:11:47 +0900
enami tsugutomo wrote:
> Adam Hoka writes:
>
> > Updated patch (it was missing one file):
> >
> > http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/flash_4.diff
>
> Is all allocated memory free'ed? At a first glance, I can't
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Adam Hoka wrote:
> Updated with suggestions from Joerg:
>
> http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/flash_6.diff
>
> --
> NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability
>
Minor modifications:
http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/fla
Updated with suggestions from Joerg:
http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/flash_6.diff
--
NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability
New version:
http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/flash_5.diff
I hope the popcount part is OK.
--
NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 10:44:45 -0800
Matt Thomas wrote:
> Use
> struct name {
> please (in flashio.h)
Can you ellaborate on this please?
--
NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 10:44:45 -0800
Matt Thomas wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2011, at 7:30 AM, Adam Hoka wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:23:19 +0100
> > Adam Hoka wrote:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> The University of Szeged, Hungary developed a F
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:23:19 +0100
Adam Hoka wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The University of Szeged, Hungary developed a Flash and NAND subsystem for
> NetBSD, which I would like to import into src. Most of the code was written
> by me so direct any questions and suggestions to me. A s
Hi!
The University of Szeged, Hungary developed a Flash and NAND subsystem for
NetBSD, which I would like to import into src. Most of the code was written
by me so direct any questions and suggestions to me. A sample driver is
provided for OMAP NAND controllers as found in BeagleBoard and DEVKIT80
On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 09:31:47 -0800
Matt Thomas wrote:
>
> On Nov 28, 2010, at 9:27 AM, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 05:21:52PM +, Sad Clouds wrote:
> >> On Sun, 28 Nov 2010 17:53:59 +0100
> >> Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> >>
> >>> One open question is how to store quota in
On Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:22:03 +0100
Johnny Billquist wrote:
> I've been looking through the netbsd mutex, and lock implementations the
> last few days, with the intent to try and improve the performance on the
> VAX, which has suffered somewhat in performance with NetBSD (maybe other
> platform
On Sun, 17 Oct 2010 03:38:42 +0900
Izumi Tsutsui wrote:
> > > > > If we should I'll enable options INSECURE by default on ports
> > > > > that require options MODULAR (to save kernel file size).
> > > >
> > > > Do not do that. You will introduce a significant security regression
> > > > ju
On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:17:04 +0900 (JST)
KIYOHARA Takashi wrote:
> I know different additional initialization to be necessary for i.MX35.
> We also should initialize to LSI dependent registers by callback
> function.
By LSI, you mean IC/chip here?
> @@ -392,6 +392,17 @@
> aprint
btw, is this intentional that lockdebug panic messages
dont end up in dmesg?
--
NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability
On Thu, 17 Jun 2010 16:53:38 +0200
Putrycy wrote:
> Hey guys. I am a noob in netbsd. I had some experience with linux before
> though.
> During my work, ive approached a problem when i need to use a
> Linux-like spin locks.
> I found out that i need to use either lock or simplelock in NetBSD.
>
On Wed, 26 May 2010 12:10:44 -0500
Matt Smith wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm working on porting the OpenAFS client over to NetBSD 5.0.2. In
> trying to compile the LKM for it, the files cpu.h and intr.h in
> /usr/include/x86/ are included. These headers include additional
> headers. The problem, howeve
On Mon, 3 May 2010 13:56:38 +0200
Tobias Nygren wrote:
> On Sun, 2 May 2010 19:32:09 -0700
> Chuck Silvers wrote:
>
> > (1) what linux distribution do we want in the pkgsrc packages?
> > the tradition has been SUSE, so I assume we'll want to use SUSE 11.x?
> > (tonio@ has volunteered to
On Fri, 09 Apr 2010 16:32:30 +0200
Christoph Egger wrote:
> On 09.04.10 16:29, Adam Hoka wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have removed pad from amd64 GENERIC, because I have added it as
> > a module instead, but I have recieved complaints about this.
> >
> > I d
Hi!
I have removed pad from amd64 GENERIC, because I have added it as
a module instead, but I have recieved complaints about this.
I dont think it needs to "pollute" generic as most users wont need
it and it appears as an audio device, which can be confusing.
I will happily add it back, but firs
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 23:14:47 +0100
Zafer Aydogan wrote:
> 2010/3/24 Adam Hoka :
> > Hi!
> >
> > Anyone can have a look at this and/or test it?
> > http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/sys_modules_pad.tar.gz
> > This is my first try at making a module,
Hi!
Anyone can have a look at this and/or test it?
http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/sys_modules_pad.tar.gz
This is my first try at making a module, so any comments
are welcomed. :-)
Cheers,
Adam
--
NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:18:54 +0100
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 06:12:40PM +0100, Adam Hoka wrote:
> > Im wondering if it would be too hack-ish to make devfs file
> > backed (at least optionally, in case of early boot or read
> > only rootfs).
> &
On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:35:24 +0900
Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Masao Uebayashi wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Johnny Billquist wrote:
> >> I missed when Jochen wrote this, so I'll comment now.
> >> This might sound tempting, but I don't think it is a
44 matches
Mail list logo
