On Sat, 2022-09-17 at 02:50 +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
> Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2022 12:59:24 -0400
> From: "David H. Gutteridge"
> Message-ID:
>
> | So there will be information loss there, at minimum. Whether that
> ends
> | up being sig
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 at 20:14:23 +, David Holland wrote:
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 01:39:16PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote:
> > Then, shouldn't the open(2) (and posix_openpt(3)) at least fail with
> > EINVAL or something if other flags are specified?
>
> The man page says:
>
> Note that unl
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022 at 11:49:32 + (UTC), RVP wrote:
On Fri, 23 Sep 2022, Anthony Mallet wrote:
Then, shouldn't the open(2) (and posix_openpt(3)) at least fail with
EINVAL or something if other flags are specified?
Yes, this was noticed recently by gutteridge@ (I think) who also
amended the
On Fri, 16 Sep 2022 at 19:00:23 +0700, Robert Elz wrote:
[...] That is, except for in pkgsrc, which is why I still
have a (very mild) concern about that one - it actually compares the
version numbers using its (until it gets changed) "Dewey" comparison
routines, and for those, 9.99.100 is unchart
