On Sun, Jan 21, 2018 at 02:00:45PM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
> I committed this morning the last part needed to completely mitigate Meltdown
> on NetBSD-amd64. As I said in the commit message, we still need to change a
> few things for KASLR - there is some address leakage, we need to hide one
>
On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 02:35:34AM +0100, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
> I'm not biased towards any approach. I just note that the current
> approach with shipping binary packages and SA is inefficient and deter
> users.
Let's try to be constructive. It's true that releasing SAs is resource
consuming a
ens. copy.S should be reviewed as CLAC/STAC intructions may be wrongly
inserted there. Thanks for your effort.
Best Regrads,
Mateusz Kocielski
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 09:40:02PM -0500, Anibal Limón wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to compile but the x86/smap.h header is missing, can you share with
> me?
It's already included in patch. ( http://netbsd.org/~shm/smap.diff )
Best Regards,
Mateusz Kocielski
e in copy.S
Feel free to do whatever you want, but don't forget to let me know about
it! :-)
Kind Regards,
Mateusz Kocielski
[1] - http://netbsd.org/~shm/smap.diff
1 there but of course XEN has to stay functional. [...] -
I haven't done it.
Best Regards,
Mateusz Kocielski
[1] http://wiki.netbsd.org/projects/project/x86_smap_smep/
ons/bound-checkers/whatever can support fuzz testing to uncover
some bugs.
--
Mateusz Kocielski
u/~bart/fuzz/Foreword1.html
[2] http://archive.netbsd.se/?ml=dfbsd-kernel&a=2006-09&t=2348821
[3] http://www.vdalabs.com/tools/efs_gpf.html
--
Mateusz Kocielski
