What's your issue with TAILQ?
Matt
- Christos Zoulas chris...@astron.com wrote:
In article 96497888-f8c7-49f2-958b-532a2093b...@gmail.com,
Dennis Ferguson dennis.c.fergu...@gmail.com wrote:
I think getting rid of uses of the CIRCLEQ macros was the right
thing
to do in any case,
Let me get on the record. It's basically ridiculous to allow GCC 4.8 to
redefine the
set of permitted C expressions such that it breaks BSD.
Matt
- Christos Zoulas chris...@zoulas.com wrote:
On Nov 26, 8:20pm, m...@linuxbox.com (Matt W. Benjamin) wrote:
-- Subject: Re: in which we
Hi,
The linked research was performed on Linux, which has NFsv4.1 and pNFS client
implementations. Evidently, you can do this kind of thing with an out-of-tree
Lua kernel extension.
Matt
- Taylor R Campbell riastr...@netbsd.org wrote:
[1] https://github.com/dergraf/PacketScript
The higher versions of the protocol prefer sites to avoid AUTH_SYS.
For discussion, see here
http://nfsworld.blogspot.com/2005/03/whats-deal-on-16-group-id-limitation.html
Independent of the auth type, an NFS server could use ordinary methods to
associate groups whatever user is selected for a
Perhaps both are acceptable. Ie, permit an FS to opt-out, then
work on new shared primitives.
Matt
- David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote:
Another model entirely, on the other hand, is to get rid of the
vfs-level vnode cache and make each fs fully responsible for its own
...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 11:16:25PM -0400, Matt W. Benjamin wrote:
NFS-per se has change a lot since...NFSv4 came out. What NFS
versions does NetBSD currently support? I had the sense that it
probably tracked Rick Macklem's FreeBSD work at some distance...
Like
NFS-per se has change a lot since...NFSv4 came out. What NFS versions does
NetBSD currently
support? I had the sense that it probably tracked Rick Macklem's FreeBSD work
at some
distance... Like, does NetBSD support pNFS?
Matt
- David Holland dholland-t...@netbsd.org wrote:
On Mon,
Hi,
Why would sync not be effective under MNT_ASYNC? Use of sync is not required
to lead to consistency expect with respect to an arbitrary point in time, but I
don't think anyone ever believed otherwise. However, there should be no
question of metadata never being written out if sync was
