On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Antti Kantee wrote:
> On Tue Oct 05 2010 at 18:24:48 -0300, Lourival Vieira Neto wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I'm glad to announce the results of my GSoC project this year [1].
>> We've created the support for scripting the NetBSD kernel with Lua,
>> which we called L
On Tue Oct 05 2010 at 18:24:48 -0300, Lourival Vieira Neto wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm glad to announce the results of my GSoC project this year [1].
> We've created the support for scripting the NetBSD kernel with Lua,
> which we called Lunatik and it is composed by a port of the Lua
> interpreter
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:50 PM, Matthew Mondor
wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 19:45:41 -0600
> Samuel Greear wrote:
>
>> I didn't like the fact that the only option for loading a script into
>> the kernel was to load the script source. I would make loading
>> pre-compiled scripts the preferential
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Alan Barrett wrote:
>
> [cross-posting removed]
>
> On Tue, 05 Oct 2010, Lourival Vieira Neto wrote:
>> We've created the support for scripting the NetBSD kernel with Lua,
>
> Instead of using "long long" as the C data type for Lua variables, I
> suggest using int6
[cross-posting removed]
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010, Lourival Vieira Neto wrote:
> We've created the support for scripting the NetBSD kernel with Lua,
Instead of using "long long" as the C data type for Lua variables, I
suggest using int64_t (which is the same size on all existing and future
platforms),
On Sun, 10 Oct 2010 19:45:41 -0600
Samuel Greear wrote:
> I didn't like the fact that the only option for loading a script into
> the kernel was to load the script source. I would make loading
> pre-compiled scripts the preferential method. In fact, I would
> probably tear eval out of the kernel
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Samuel Greear wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Lourival Vieira Neto
> wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> I'm glad to announce the results of my GSoC project this year [1].
>> We've created the support for scripting the NetBSD kernel with Lua,
>> which we called Lu
On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Samuel Greear wrote:
> (...)
> My brief notes (from memory):
>
> I didn't see any bindings, maybe there were some, but if I missed them
> there can't be very many, Lua in the kernel is fairly useless unless
> you can call into the public kernel api.
Our proposal
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Lourival Vieira Neto
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm glad to announce the results of my GSoC project this year [1].
> We've created the support for scripting the NetBSD kernel with Lua,
> which we called Lunatik and it is composed by a port of the Lua
> interpreter to th
Hi folks,
I'm glad to announce the results of my GSoC project this year [1].
We've created the support for scripting the NetBSD kernel with Lua,
which we called Lunatik and it is composed by a port of the Lua
interpreter to the kernel, a kernel programming interface for
extending subsystems and a
10 matches
Mail list logo
