On Sun, 19 Mar 2023 at 04:22, Theodore Preduta wrote:
>
> > The Linux Test Project (http://linux-test-project.github.io) would help
> > not only with finding missing syscalls, but also with finding bugs /
> > missing functionality in the existing Linux emul code.
>
> Yes this is a great idea!
> The Linux Test Project (http://linux-test-project.github.io) would help
> not only with finding missing syscalls, but also with finding bugs /
> missing functionality in the existing Linux emul code.
Yes this is a great idea! Although my interpretation of the project
idea is that the
Hi Theodore --
The Linux Test Project (http://linux-test-project.github.io) would help
not only with finding missing syscalls, but also with finding bugs /
missing functionality in the existing Linux emul code. It would be nice to
have this running on NetBSD.
Take care,
Jared
On Mon, 13
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 12:10:11AM -0400, Theodore Preduta wrote:
> (1) Is there any documentation on the internals of this subsystem? (manpage
> and wiki seem to just be how to use it)
I wrote a series of articles 22 years ago on the topic. All links are now dead,
but we still have them thanks
> (2) Is there a better binary-finding strategy than trying Linux
> binaries on NetBSD, and if they fail (have a script) compare the
> output of strace from a Linux run of the program with the table in
> sys/compat/linux/arch/*/linux_syscalls.c?
Better? Maybe, maybe not. But what I did in a
As the subject suggests, I think the emulating missing Linux syscalls
project might be fun. I am just wondering
(1) Is there any documentation on the internals of this subsystem?
(manpage and wiki seem to just be how to use it)
(2) Is there a better binary-finding strategy than trying Linux
