Re: Big test regression in -current

2014-06-10 Thread Justin Cormack
All the issues I saw have been resolved - thanks everyone. Justin

Re: Big test regression in -current

2014-06-09 Thread Paul Goyette
And after updating again we are down to a handfull of unusual failures: Summary for 587 test programs: 3781 passed test cases. 21 failed test cases. 32 expected failed test cases. 75 skipped test cases. My amd64 test-bed is also back to a more normal failure count: Source Che

Re: Big test regression in -current

2014-06-09 Thread Justin Cormack
On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Martin Husemann wrote: > And after updating again we are down to a handfull of unusual failures: > > Summary for 587 test programs: > 3781 passed test cases. > 21 failed test cases. > 32 expected failed test cases. > 75 skipped test cases. I am look

Re: Big test regression in -current

2014-06-09 Thread Martin Husemann
And after updating again we are down to a handfull of unusual failures: Summary for 587 test programs: 3781 passed test cases. 21 failed test cases. 32 expected failed test cases. 75 skipped test cases. Martin

Re: Big test regression in -current

2014-06-09 Thread Martin Husemann
On Mon, Jun 09, 2014 at 06:37:11PM +0200, Martin Husemann wrote: > On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 04:24:55PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: > > That is RUMP-specific. Fixed now. > > Still not much better for me: Ooops, something went wrong with my cvs update - will retry. Martin

Re: Big test regression in -current

2014-06-09 Thread Martin Husemann
On Sun, Jun 08, 2014 at 04:24:55PM +0100, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: > That is RUMP-specific. Fixed now. Still not much better for me: Summary for 587 test programs: 3723 passed test cases. 81 failed test cases. 32 expected failed test cases. 73 skipped test cases. Any speci

Re: Big test regression in -current

2014-06-08 Thread Justin Cormack
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote: > Martin Husemann wrote: >> Something seriously happened to -current in the last few days. Between >> June 2 and June 8 the number of test failures jumped from 17 to 80, see: >> >> http://www.netbsd.org/~martin/sparc64-atf/ >> >> Some

Re: Big test regression in -current

2014-06-08 Thread Mindaugas Rasiukevicius
Martin Husemann wrote: > Something seriously happened to -current in the last few days. Between > June 2 and June 8 the number of test failures jumped from 17 to 80, see: > > http://www.netbsd.org/~martin/sparc64-atf/ > > Some rump test crash like this: > > panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "c

Re: Big test regression in -current

2014-06-08 Thread Paul Goyette
I see a similar jump in failures on my amd64 system, between June 5 and June 6 ... Source Check-Out TimePassFail XFailSkip 2014-06-06 01:50:16 3781 124 54 80 2014-06-05 18:50:16 3867 33 56 83 On Sun, 8 Jun 2014, Martin Husemann wrote: Some

Big test regression in -current

2014-06-08 Thread Martin Husemann
Something seriously happened to -current in the last few days. Between June 2 and June 8 the number of test failures jumped from 17 to 80, see: http://www.netbsd.org/~martin/sparc64-atf/ Some rump test crash like this: panic: kernel diagnostic assertion "curcpu() == ci" failed: file "/usr/src/l