On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:14:02PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:06:08PM +, David Holland wrote:
> >
> > Does it matter? Is there a case where a driver's notion of MAXPHYS
> > should depend on anything other than the buses it's attached to?
>
> I see you say "
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:14:02PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > Does it matter? Is there a case where a driver's notion of MAXPHYS
> > should depend on anything other than the buses it's attached to?
>
> I see you say "buses". So I assume you're taking into account funny
> constrain
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 06:06:08PM +, David Holland wrote:
>
> Does it matter? Is there a case where a driver's notion of MAXPHYS
> should depend on anything other than the buses it's attached to?
I see you say "buses". So I assume you're taking into account funny
constraints to do with bus
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 12:03:49PM -0400, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> > > Aside from pseudodevices, do we have any devices which aren't children
> > > of mainbus? Some ports' use of obio seems like, perhaps, a
> > > candidate for
> > > this, but I have not started checking them all.
> >
>
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 08:52:38AM -0700, Matt Thomas wrote:
>
> On Jun 5, 2012, at 8:42 AM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
>
> > Aside from pseudodevices, do we have any devices which aren't children
> > of mainbus? Some ports' use of obio seems like, perhaps, a candidate for
> > this, but I have n
On Jun 5, 2012, at 8:42 AM, Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
> Aside from pseudodevices, do we have any devices which aren't children
> of mainbus? Some ports' use of obio seems like, perhaps, a candidate for
> this, but I have not started checking them all.
directly or through parents?
Not all port
Aside from pseudodevices, do we have any devices which aren't children
of mainbus? Some ports' use of obio seems like, perhaps, a candidate for
this, but I have not started checking them all.
--
Thor Lancelot Simont...@panix.com
"We cannot usually in
