On Sun, 20 Feb 2011 19:00:38 +
Mindaugas Rasiukevicius wrote:
> Adam Hoka wrote:
> > Latest update: http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/flash_9.diff
> >
> > I will commit this in the following days if there are no other
> > suggestions.
>
> - Why hamming code is sys/dev rather than libker
Adam Hoka wrote:
> Latest update: http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/flash_9.diff
>
> I will commit this in the following days if there are no other
> suggestions.
- Why hamming code is sys/dev rather than libkern? Perhaps also move
nand_crc16() there as well?
- nand_sync_thread_start: pass
Latest update: http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/flash_9.diff
I will commit this in the following days if there are no other
suggestions.
Thanks.
--
NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability
On 14 Feb 2011 18:11:47 +0900
enami tsugutomo wrote:
> Adam Hoka writes:
>
> > Updated patch (it was missing one file):
> >
> > http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/flash_4.diff
>
> Is all allocated memory free'ed? At a first glance, I can't find free
> for nbbt_bitmap and flash_if.
>
> ena
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Adam Hoka wrote:
> Updated with suggestions from Joerg:
>
> http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/flash_6.diff
>
> --
> NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability
>
Minor modifications:
http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/flash_7.diff
--
NetBSD - Simpli
Updated with suggestions from Joerg:
http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/flash_6.diff
--
NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability
New version:
http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/flash_5.diff
I hope the popcount part is OK.
--
NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability
On Feb 14, 2011, at 12:46 AM, Adam Hoka wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 10:44:45 -0800
> Matt Thomas wrote:
>
>> Use
>> struct name {
>> please (in flashio.h)
>
> Can you ellaborate on this please?
struct foo
{
...
};
is not KNF.
struct foo {
...
};
is KNF.
Adam Hoka writes:
> Updated patch (it was missing one file):
>
> http://www.netbsd.org/~ahoka/patches/flash_4.diff
Is all allocated memory free'ed? At a first glance, I can't find free
for nbbt_bitmap and flash_if.
enami.
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 10:44:45 -0800
Matt Thomas wrote:
> Use
> struct name {
> please (in flashio.h)
Can you ellaborate on this please?
--
NetBSD - Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability
On Feb 13, 2011, at 2:20 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 02:11:30PM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 13, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:44:45AM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
CountBitsInByte should be replaced by __bu
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 02:11:30PM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:44:45AM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
> >> CountBitsInByte should be replaced by __builtin_popcount so that
> >> machines with a popcount instructi
On Feb 13, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:44:45AM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
>> CountBitsInByte should be replaced by __builtin_popcount so that
>> machines with a popcount instruction can use it.
>
> Which ones? There is no assembler version of popcount
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:44:45AM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
> CountBitsInByte should be replaced by __builtin_popcount so that
> machines with a popcount instruction can use it.
Which ones? There is no assembler version of popcount at the moment.
SPARC64 doesn't use it for ffs(), the AMD64 one ha
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 10:44:45AM -0800, Matt Thomas wrote:
>
> consider implementing nand_crc16 via a nibble lookup table.
Is it the 'standard' crc16 (x^16 + x^15 + x^2 + 1) ?
There is a trivial xor and shift sequence for it (bytewise) that
will be faster than the byte lookup on anything that c
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 10:44:45 -0800
Matt Thomas wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2011, at 7:30 AM, Adam Hoka wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:23:19 +0100
> > Adam Hoka wrote:
> >
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> The University of Szeged, Hungary developed a Flash and NAND subsystem for
> >> NetBSD, which I would l
On Feb 13, 2011, at 7:30 AM, Adam Hoka wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:23:19 +0100
> Adam Hoka wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> The University of Szeged, Hungary developed a Flash and NAND subsystem for
>> NetBSD, which I would like to import into src. Most of the code was written
>> by me so direct any
On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:23:19 +0100
Adam Hoka wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The University of Szeged, Hungary developed a Flash and NAND subsystem for
> NetBSD, which I would like to import into src. Most of the code was written
> by me so direct any questions and suggestions to me. A sample driver is
> provi
Hi!
The University of Szeged, Hungary developed a Flash and NAND subsystem for
NetBSD, which I would like to import into src. Most of the code was written
by me so direct any questions and suggestions to me. A sample driver is
provided for OMAP NAND controllers as found in BeagleBoard and DEVKIT80
19 matches
Mail list logo
