> Do you have the details for the quotaoff panic?
(typed from a photo)
uvm_fault(0x80006c9d0a38, 0x0, 1) -> e
kernel: page fault trap, code=0
Stopped in pid 24097.1 (quotaoff) atnetbsd:dqflush+0x38:cmpq%rdi,0x8
0(%rdx,%rax,8)
db> bt
netbsd:dqflush+0x38:
db> show registers
ds 0x
hello. I've been using NetBSD in server environments, including file
server environments, for 15 years. To me, the fact that you're still
running NetBSD-4 aand you've been able to get everything back in working
order after a series of unfortunate events, presumably after the machine
has r
> that depends on how you measure "users"
Well...people whose home directories reside on that file server.
At 20:41 Uhr +0100 05.03.2012, Edgar Fuß wrote:
[I'll third the request for sane line lengths, for mail readers as well as
for customers like the gnats db]
>After the recent problems[*] we've been having with our (4.0/amd64) file
>server, I'll surely be facing the question why we're not using tha
Am 05.03.12 20:41, schrieb Edgar Fuß:
> After the recent problems[*] we've been having with our (4.0/amd64) file
> server, I'll surely be facing the question why we're not using that other OS
> everybody else does.
You sureley mean an up-to-date version of NetBSD, right? btw, if you
would fold
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 08:41:39PM +0100, Edgar Fuß wrote:
> After the recent problems[*] we've been having with our (4.0/amd64) file
> server, I'll surely be facing the question why we're not using that other OS
> everybody else does.
>
> So I need some data for that upcoming discussion. Who is
> So I need some data for that upcoming discussion. Who is using NetBSD to ope$
Please don't use paragraph-length lines.
> So I need some data for that upcoming discussion. Who is using
> NetBSD to operate a file server on a scale comparable to or larger
> than ours, i.e. ~200 users, ~1TB storag
On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 08:41:39PM +0100, Edgar Fu? wrote:
> After the recent problems[*] we've been having with our (4.0/amd64)
> file server, I'll surely be facing the question why we're not using
> that other OS everybody else does.
>
> So I need some data for that upcoming discussion. Who
After the recent problems[*] we've been having with our (4.0/amd64) file
server, I'll surely be facing the question why we're not using that other OS
everybody else does.
So I need some data for that upcoming discussion. Who is using NetBSD to
operate a file server on a scale comparable to or l
