Michael McConville writes:
> Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:15:34PM -0400, Michael McConville wrote:
> > > I suspect that this preproc condition isn't necessary anymore? It's in
> > > sys/sys/device.h:246.
> >
> > We require C99 support for the kernel, so no, just use FMA
Michael McConville wrote:
> Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:15:34PM -0400, Michael McConville wrote:
> > > I suspect that this preproc condition isn't necessary anymore? It's in
> > > sys/sys/device.h:246.
> >
> > We require C99 support for the kernel, so no, just use FMA.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18.09.2015 00:53, Michael McConville wrote:
> Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:15:34PM -0400, Michael McConville
>> wrote:
>>> I suspect that this preproc condition isn't necessary anymore?
>>> It's in sys/sys/device.h:246.
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:15:34PM -0400, Michael McConville wrote:
> > I suspect that this preproc condition isn't necessary anymore? It's in
> > sys/sys/device.h:246.
>
> We require C99 support for the kernel, so no, just use FMA.
Would the devs be interested in a bu
On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 11:15:34PM -0400, Michael McConville wrote:
> I suspect that this preproc condition isn't necessary anymore? It's in
> sys/sys/device.h:246.
We require C99 support for the kernel, so no, just use FMA.
Joerg
I suspect that this preproc condition isn't necessary anymore? It's in
sys/sys/device.h:246.
/*
* Description of an interface attribute, provided by potential
* parent device drivers, referred to by child device configuration data.
*/
struct cfiattrdata {
const char *ci_name;
i
