Re: FW: ixg(4) performances

2014-10-01 Thread David Laight
On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 12:07:38PM -0400, Terry Moore wrote: > > This is not 2.5G Transfers per second. PCIe talks about transactions rather > than transfers; one transaction requires either 12 bytes (for 32-bit > systems) or 16 bytes (for 64-bit systems) of overhead at the transaction > layer, pl

RE: FW: ixg(4) performances

2014-09-03 Thread Terry Moore
>From Emmanuel Dreyfus > You are right; > # pcictl /dev/pci5 read -d 0 -f 1 0xa8 > 00092810 > # pcictl /dev/pci5 write -d 0 -f 1 0xa8 0x00094810 > # pcictl /dev/pci5 read -d 0 -f 1 0xa8 > 4810 That's reassuring. The dump confirms that we're looking at the right registers, thank you. As I read

RE: FW: ixg(4) performances

2014-09-03 Thread Terry Moore
> -Original Message- > From: Hisashi T Fujinaka [mailto:ht...@twofifty.com] > Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2014 12:39 > To: Terry Moore > Cc: tech-kern@netbsd.org > Subject: RE: FW: ixg(4) performances > > I may be wrong in the transactions/transfers. However, I th

Re: FW: ixg(4) performances

2014-08-31 Thread Masanobu SAITOH
Hi, Emmanuel. On 2014/09/01 11:10, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > Terry Moore wrote: > >> Since you did a dword read, the extra 0x9 is the device status register. >> This makes me suspicious as the device status register is claiming that you >> have "unsupported request detected)" [bit 3] and "co

Re: FW: ixg(4) performances

2014-08-31 Thread Emmanuel Dreyfus
Terry Moore wrote: > Since you did a dword read, the extra 0x9 is the device status register. > This makes me suspicious as the device status register is claiming that you > have "unsupported request detected)" [bit 3] and "correctable error > detected" [bit 0]. Further, this register is RW1

RE: FW: ixg(4) performances

2014-08-31 Thread Hisashi T Fujinaka
Oh, and to answer the actual first, relevant question, I can try finding out if we (day job, 82599) can do line rate at 2.5GT/s. I think we can get a lot closer than you're getting but we don't test with NetBSD. -- Hisashi T Fujinaka - ht...@twofifty.com BSEE + BSChem + BAEnglish + MSCS + $2.50 =

RE: FW: ixg(4) performances

2014-08-31 Thread Hisashi T Fujinaka
rate is not used when talking about the max data transfer rate. On Sun, 31 Aug 2014, Terry Moore wrote: -Original Message- From: Hisashi T Fujinaka [mailto:ht...@twofifty.com] Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2014 21:29 To: Terry Moore Cc: tech-kern@netbsd.org Subject: Re: FW: ixg(4) perform

RE: FW: ixg(4) performances

2014-08-31 Thread Terry Moore
> -Original Message- > From: Hisashi T Fujinaka [mailto:ht...@twofifty.com] > Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2014 21:29 > To: Terry Moore > Cc: tech-kern@netbsd.org > Subject: Re: FW: ixg(4) performances > > Doesn't anyone read my posts or, more important,

Re: FW: ixg(4) performances

2014-08-30 Thread Hisashi T Fujinaka
Doesn't anyone read my posts or, more important, the PCIe spec? 2.5 Giga TRANSFERS per second. On Sat, 30 Aug 2014, Terry Moore wrote: Forgot to cc the list. -Original Message- From: Terry Moore [mailto:t...@mcci.com] Sent: Friday, August 29, 2014 15:13 To: 'Emmanuel Dreyfus' Subject: