On Sun, 20 Dec 2015, Rhialto wrote:
On Sun 20 Dec 2015 at 16:19:34 +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
I like to think that I run a kernel from a third class:
HIGHLY-MODULAR
These kernels include only a minimum amount of built-in code,
and any additional functionality is loaded as need
On Sun 20 Dec 2015 at 16:19:34 +0800, Paul Goyette wrote:
> I like to think that I run a kernel from a third class:
>
> HIGHLY-MODULAR
>
> These kernels include only a minimum amount of built-in code,
> and any additional functionality is loaded as needed. I have
> fewer than 2
On Sun, 20 Dec 2015, Michael van Elst wrote:
p...@whooppee.com (Paul Goyette) writes:
The attached diffs (plus 2 new files) convert our existing raidframe
driver into a loadable module.
Does this still work with a non-MODULAR kernel?
Short answer: Yes
More details:
Whether or not a kern
p...@whooppee.com (Paul Goyette) writes:
>The attached diffs (plus 2 new files) convert our existing raidframe
>driver into a loadable module.
Does this still work with a non-MODULAR kernel?
--
--
Michael van Elst
Internet: mlel...@serpens.de
