On 21.12.2017 10:43, Martin Husemann wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 07:16:09AM +, co...@sdf.org wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> COMPAT_IRIX needed e_fault, an alternative implementation of uvm_fault.
>> But it's been removed. can I remove e_fault from the struct, or would
>> this break compat too hard?
On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 07:16:09AM +, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> Hi,
>
> COMPAT_IRIX needed e_fault, an alternative implementation of uvm_fault.
> But it's been removed. can I remove e_fault from the struct, or would
> this break compat too hard?
>
> Its sole use is a check in mips/trap.c. I
Hi,
COMPAT_IRIX needed e_fault, an alternative implementation of uvm_fault.
But it's been removed. can I remove e_fault from the struct, or would
this break compat too hard?
Its sole use is a check in mips/trap.c. I would like to remove this,
too.