re: ZFS works on 8.99.34 but fails on 201905260520Z

2019-05-29 Thread matthew green
> Do we really expect module updates without updating kernel > to work? > > If yes will do iot next time. yes - if you add, not just change, to the kernel abi in a way that modules will notice, please bump the version. it should make this sort of problem more obvious (due to missing file errors,

Re: ZFS works on 8.99.34 but fails on 201905260520Z

2019-05-29 Thread Paul Goyette
On Wed, 29 May 2019, Petr Topiarz wrote: Thank you for this investigation, now its clear, where the problem lays, I will reinstall when this is corrected. Kernel version has just been bumped, so newer kernel with newer modules (version 8.99.42) should work just fine. ++

Re: ZFS works on 8.99.34 but fails on 201905260520Z

2019-05-29 Thread Petr Topiarz
Thank you for this investigation, now its clear, where the problem lays, I will reinstall when this is corrected. Peter Dne 29. 05. 19 v 1:38 Paul Goyette napsal(a): The commit that introduced the new symbol should also have bumped the kernel version...  That's how we keep modules and kernel i

Re: ZFS works on 8.99.34 but fails on 201905260520Z

2019-05-29 Thread J. Hannken-Illjes
> On 29. May 2019, at 01:38, Paul Goyette wrote: > > The commit that introduced the new symbol should also have bumped the kernel > version... That's how we keep modules and kernel in sync... > > > On Tue, 28 May 2019, m...@netbsd.org wrote: > >> Found the commit - looks like newer modules t

Re: ZFS works on 8.99.34 but fails on 201905260520Z

2019-05-28 Thread Petr Topiarz
Thanks, I will do that, though I do now know how this happened. Dne 28. 05. 19 v 23:40 J. Hannken-Illjes napsal(a): Petr, your kernel is elder than your ZFS module. Please update to a current kernel and try again. -- J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de - TU Braunschweig On 28. May

Re: ZFS works on 8.99.34 but fails on 201905260520Z

2019-05-28 Thread Paul Goyette
The commit that introduced the new symbol should also have bumped the kernel version... That's how we keep modules and kernel in sync... On Tue, 28 May 2019, m...@netbsd.org wrote: Found the commit - looks like newer modules than kernel. https://v4.freshbsd.org/commit/netbsd/src/IH8Jag0YCI3N

Re: ZFS works on 8.99.34 but fails on 201905260520Z

2019-05-28 Thread maya
Found the commit - looks like newer modules than kernel. https://v4.freshbsd.org/commit/netbsd/src/IH8Jag0YCI3N6boB

Re: ZFS works on 8.99.34 but fails on 201905260520Z

2019-05-28 Thread Paul Goyette
On Tue, 28 May 2019, m...@netbsd.org wrote: On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 08:27:20PM +0200, Petr Topiarz wrote: May 28 18:55:46 poweredge /netbsd: [ 236.3881944] kobj_checksyms, 988: [zfs]: linker error: symbol `disk_rename' not found Usually this happens if kernel and modules are mismatched. I'm n

Re: ZFS works on 8.99.34 but fails on 201905260520Z

2019-05-28 Thread J. Hannken-Illjes
Petr, your kernel is elder than your ZFS module. Please update to a current kernel and try again. -- J. Hannken-Illjes - hann...@eis.cs.tu-bs.de - TU Braunschweig > On 28. May 2019, at 20:27, Petr Topiarz wrote: > > Hi Tech-kern, > > I run two machines with NetBSD amd64 with ZFS, one is wi

Re: ZFS works on 8.99.34 but fails on 201905260520Z

2019-05-28 Thread maya
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 08:27:20PM +0200, Petr Topiarz wrote: > May 28 18:55:46 poweredge /netbsd: [ 236.3881944] kobj_checksyms, 988: > [zfs]: linker error: symbol `disk_rename' not found Usually this happens if kernel and modules are mismatched. I'm not sure what happened to cause it, but buildi

ZFS works on 8.99.34 but fails on 201905260520Z

2019-05-28 Thread Petr Topiarz
Hi Tech-kern, I run two machines with NetBSD amd64 with ZFS, one is with 8.99.34 kernel from february, the other is the latest today, 201905260520Z, It all runs fine with the first one, but as I upgraded the other, ZFS does not load and tels me: modload: zfs: Exec format error and to /var