> On Dec 11, 2023, at 5:00 AM, Robert Swindells wrote:
>
>> Is it OK to use for NetBSD "native" code since it is not "advertised"
>> by a man page?
>
> No.
Heavy asterisk here.
Thierry, let’s chat off-list.
-- thorpej
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 01:00:38PM +, Robert Swindells wrote:
>
> tlaro...@kergis.com wrote:
> > In Mesa code implementations for futex_wake() and futex_wait() are
> > provided for Linux, Windows, FreeBSD and OpenBSD.
> >
> > There is a __futex(2) syscall in NetBSD, used only for now, if I'm n
tlaro...@kergis.com wrote:
> In Mesa code implementations for futex_wake() and futex_wait() are
> provided for Linux, Windows, FreeBSD and OpenBSD.
>
> There is a __futex(2) syscall in NetBSD, used only for now, if I'm not
> mistaken, to implement Linux compat.
The Linux emulation of futexes in
In Mesa code implementations for futex_wake() and futex_wait() are
provided for Linux, Windows, FreeBSD and OpenBSD.
There is a __futex(2) syscall in NetBSD, used only for now, if I'm not
mistaken, to implement Linux compat.
Is it OK to use for NetBSD "native" code since it is not "advertised"
by
