Hi guys,
Is this project https://wiki.netbsd.org/projects/project/ffs-fallocate/ easy
they way it seems to be?
Basically, it is just create a ffs_fallocate function in
sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c. Inside this function I make a loop calling the
ffs_alloc function. During the loop I should check for
Yes, me.
W dniu wtorek, 4 października 2022 Piyush Sachdeva <
piyushsachdeva...@gmail.com> napisał(a):
> Is someone currently looking into this?
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Piyush Sachdeva
>
--
Pozdrawiam,
Patryk Ząbkiewicz
Is someone currently looking into this?
--
Best Regards,
Piyush Sachdeva
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 11:53:46PM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> > > I will try to figure it out, since its not yet implemented the syscall
> > > is a
> > > good way to start dev in BSD kernel.
> >
> > I'm not sure about that; many people have started looking at it and
> > not got anywhe
>>> I will try to figure it out, since its not yet implemented the
>>> syscall is a good way to start dev in BSD kernel.
>> I'm not sure about that; many people have started looking at it and
>> not got anywhere.
> It is true that adding a system call is an easy entry point to learn
> about the ker
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 11:24:15PM +, David Holland wrote:
> > I will try to figure it out, since its not yet implemented the syscall is a
> > good way to start dev in BSD kernel.
>
> I'm not sure about that; many people have started looking at it and
> not got anywhere.
It is true that add
On Mon, Sep 26, 2022 at 06:15:23PM +0200, Patryk wrote:
> I will try to figure it out, since its not yet implemented the syscall is a
> good way to start dev in BSD kernel.
I'm not sure about that; many people have started looking at it and
not got anywhere.
--
David A. Holland
dholl...@netbsd
Hi,
I will try to figure it out, since its not yet implemented the syscall is a
good way to start dev in BSD kernel.
Pozdrawiam,
Patryk Ząbkiewicz
niedz., 25 wrz 2022 o 21:15 Reinoud Zandijk napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 03:51:26PM +0200, Patryk wrote:
> > is this item already
Hi,
On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 03:51:26PM +0200, Patryk wrote:
> is this item already developed in netBSD or should I start looking into it ?
> https://wiki.netbsd.org/projects/project/ffs-fallocate/
AFAIK, its not implemented yet in NetBSD. I guess it got a bit on the back
burner due to the tendenc
Hi,
is this item already developed in netBSD or should I start looking into it ?
https://wiki.netbsd.org/projects/project/ffs-fallocate/
hi!
i am apoorv! I'm interested in working on this project.
fallocate for ffs: https://wiki.netbsd.org/projects/project/ffs-fallocate/
can you direct me further ?
thanks
am interested in working on project 'fallocate for FFS'. I
> wanted to make sure that this project is still open and someone's not
> assigned to it already. Also, I have some questions about it.
>
> I have read file system internals guide and have some general ideas on
Hello.
I'm Jay and I am interested in working on project 'fallocate for FFS'. I
wanted to make sure that this project is still open and someone's not
assigned to it already. Also, I have some questions about it.
I have read file system internals guide and have some general id
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 01:16:38PM +0530, Manas Mangaonkar wrote:
> I am a computer Engineering Sophomore year student and want to work on
> this(not as a part of GSOC or anything else) Is anyone else working on
> this,If no can you point to some resources that will help me get started.I
> want
Hey,
I am a computer Engineering Sophomore year student and want to work on
this(not as a part of GSOC or anything else) Is anyone else working on
this,If no can you point to some resources that will help me get started.I
want to begin coding asap. Familiar with Unix
In article ,
Talha Karadeniz wrote:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>Hi,
>
>I am writing this mail to request authorization for joining the development
>of the project 'fallocate for FFS' [I am new at NetBSD and system
>programming, so I chose this one as a start
Hi,
I am writing this mail to request authorization for joining the development
of the project 'fallocate for FFS' [I am new at NetBSD and system
programming, so I chose this one as a starting point:
http://wiki.netbsd.org/projects/project/ffs-fallocate], if it is still
active and if y
On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 12:16:43AM +, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> > but even ignoring that, the patch doesn't seem to actually work:
> > "ls -ls" shows that the number of blocks allocated to the file doesn't
> > change.
>
> But OTOH I df shows a growing FS. Did I just managed to leak block
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 09:16:24AM -0700, Chuck Silvers wrote:
> but even ignoring that, the patch doesn't seem to actually work:
> "ls -ls" shows that the number of blocks allocated to the file doesn't change.
But OTOH I df shows a growing FS. Did I just managed to leak blocks that
are allocated
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 09:16:24AM -0700, Chuck Silvers wrote:
> the bigger problem is that fallocate() wants a way to record that the blocks
> are not initialized, so that reading from those offsets can return zeroes
> instead of reading the uninitialized blocks from disk, but the FFS metadata
> h
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 06:07:21AM +0200, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
>
> > Implementing fallocate for FFS seems quite obvious. Is there anything I
> > missed in the patch below? Is it good enough to commit?
>
> Updated version that spares some p
Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote:
> Implementing fallocate for FFS seems quite obvious. Is there anything I
> missed in the patch below? Is it good enough to commit?
Updated version that spares some panic by properly calling
uvm_vnp_setsize(). Any comment?
Index: sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_ex
Implementing fallocate for FFS seems quite obvious. Is there anything I
missed in the patch below? Is it good enough to commit?
This lets me discover that posix_fallocate() libc stub is buggy. Using
it through #include leads argument corruption. Defining it as
int posix_fallocate(int, int
23 matches
Mail list logo
