In article <20121014193635.6ccf360...@jupiter.mumble.net>, Taylor R Campbell <campbell+netbsd-tech-k...@mumble.net> wrote: >-=-=-=-=-=- > >The attached patches fixes a lot of issues in our zfs port mainly >having to do with locking and our (insane) vop protocols. With it, >many of the zfs tests pass much more reliably, although there remain a >number that still fail, mainly having to do with permissions and file >flags. > >Currently zfs is badly hosed, and I am pretty confident that at least >the intent of these patches is correct even if I have made some >mistakes in the details. So I strongly doubt whether committing these >patches would make our zfs situation any worse than it currently is. > >Any objections? If not, I'll commit them tomorrow or in the next few >days.
None from here. christos
