> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2017 13:13:42 +0100
> From: Robert Swindells
>
> co...@sdf.org wrote:
> >this number is way too easy to hit just linking things in pkgsrc. can we
> >raise it? things fail hard when it is hit.
> >
> >ive seen people say 'when your build dies, restart it with MAKE_JOBS=1
> >so i
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 09:53:29AM +0200, Patrick Welche wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 06:33:01AM +, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> > this number is way too easy to hit just linking things in pkgsrc. can we
> > raise it? things fail hard when it is hit.
> >
> > ive seen people say 'when your build
co...@sdf.org wrote:
>this number is way too easy to hit just linking things in pkgsrc. can we
>raise it? things fail hard when it is hit.
>
>ive seen people say 'when your build dies, restart it with MAKE_JOBS=1
>so it doesn't link in parallel'.
I saw this for the first time today too.
Maybe so
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 06:33:01AM +, co...@sdf.org wrote:
> this number is way too easy to hit just linking things in pkgsrc. can we
> raise it? things fail hard when it is hit.
>
> ive seen people say 'when your build dies, restart it with MAKE_JOBS=1
> so it doesn't link in parallel'.
In t
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017, co...@sdf.org wrote:
Hi,
this number is way too easy to hit just linking things in pkgsrc. can we
raise it? things fail hard when it is hit.
ive seen people say 'when your build dies, restart it with MAKE_JOBS=1
so it doesn't link in parallel'.
I run my machine with kern
Hi,
this number is way too easy to hit just linking things in pkgsrc. can we
raise it? things fail hard when it is hit.
ive seen people say 'when your build dies, restart it with MAKE_JOBS=1
so it doesn't link in parallel'.