Hi,
Yesterday I debugged why the temperature values seen in envstat on my mainboard
looked very odd (70 degC while the bios hardware monitor shows 40 degC). As I
described in the bugreport, it is a missing initialization.
I also attached a patch to the bugreport, which fixes the problem to me.
Ho
I'll have a look.
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I debugged why the temperature values seen in envstat on my mainboard
looked very odd (70 degC while the bios hardware monitor shows 40 degC). As I
described in the bugreport, it is a missing initialization.
I also
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
Hi,
Yesterday I debugged why the temperature values seen in envstat on my mainboard
looked very odd (70 degC while the bios hardware monitor shows 40 degC). As I
described in the bugreport, it is a missing initialization.
I also attached a patch to
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your help so far.
Excerpts from Paul Goyette's message of So Feb 07 22:06:23 +0100 2010:
> a) all W83627HF use temp sensors of type 3904, or
> b) the W83627HF on "this board" uses 3904.
> Any chance you can do some research in the datasheet to see if there is
> any
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your help so far.
Excerpts from Paul Goyette's message of So Feb 07 22:06:23 +0100 2010:
a) all W83627HF use temp sensors of type 3904, or
b) the W83627HF on "this board" uses 3904.
Any chance you can do some research
Hi Paul,
Excerpts from Paul Goyette's message of So Feb 07 23:27:57 +0100 2010:
> I think it would be OK to add a 'flags' to the config syntax, so you
> would say
>
> lm* at iic? addr 0xXX flags 1
>
> to enable 2N3904 bipolar temp sensors. The default would be to keep
> current behavior
On Sun, 7 Feb 2010, Paul Goyette wrote:
In the wiki on lm-sensors.org I could find only one configuration which
actually uses the temperature sensors of the W83627HF. This configuration
also configures it to use the 3904 mode.
Yes, I went through the datasheet, too, and there seems to be no wa
Hi Paul,
Excerpts from Paul Goyette's message of Mo Feb 08 00:14:44 +0100 2010:
> Can you try the attached diff, and set 'flags 1' in your config file?
The patch works fine. I would suggest to use flag 2, however, to be consistent
with the linux driver.
Best regards,
Michael
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, Michael Stapelberg wrote:
Hi Paul,
Excerpts from Paul Goyette's message of Mo Feb 08 00:14:44 +0100 2010:
Can you try the attached diff, and set 'flags 1' in your config file?
The patch works fine. I would suggest to use flag 2, however, to be consistent
with the linux dri
