On 2017/12/27 1:37, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 07:05:38PM +0900, Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
so checking mp_online is the best, right?
I wonder if we should additionaly check for ncpu >= 2 (or ncpuonline >=
2), but that is probably overoptimization.
I think doing optimization
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 07:05:38PM +0900, Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
> > so checking mp_online is the best, right?
I wonder if we should additionaly check for ncpu >= 2 (or ncpuonline >=
2), but that is probably overoptimization.
Martin
On 2017/12/26 11:59, Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
On 2017/12/25 20:26, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 03:42:06PM +0900, Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
Is this intended behavior? Is it possible to use xcall while
cold==1?
Cold is (as you noted) not the right condition (but pretty close
On 2017/12/25 20:26, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 03:42:06PM +0900, Masanobu SAITOH wrote:
Is this intended behavior? Is it possible to use xcall while
cold==1?
Cold is (as you noted) not the right condition (but pretty close).
Xcalls don't really make any sense before
ssertion "xc->xc_donep < xc->xc_headp" failed: file
"../../../../kern/subr_xcall.c", line 286
(Yes, the exact reason is not cold==1 but all CPU's SPCF_RUNNING is not set)
Is this intended behavior? Is it possible to use xcall while
cold==1?
For softint_establish(
