Re: Flavor Review Request for Ubuntu GNOME

2013-03-04 Thread Allison Randal
On 03/04/2013 03:04 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > "Ubuntu GNOME" would be fine with me; in casual conversation I have > left off the "Remix" anyway. I actually like the two-word version better anyway. It's easier to say, and fits better on websites, t-shirts, etc. > I did talk with Karen briefly w

Re: Flavor Review Request for Ubuntu GNOME

2013-03-04 Thread Jeremy Bicha
On 4 March 2013 17:41, Allison Randal wrote: > On 03/04/2013 02:14 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >> Thanks all for the meeting today. One thing we didn't discuss was >> whether we could use the name 'Ubuntu GNOME Edition'. > > Historically, the word "Edition" has a very specific meaning for the > Ubuntu

Re: Flavor Review Request for Ubuntu GNOME

2013-03-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, March 04, 2013 02:52:35 PM Allison Randal wrote: > On 03/04/2013 02:41 PM, Allison Randal wrote: > > On 03/04/2013 02:14 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > >> Thanks all for the meeting today. One thing we didn't discuss was > >> whether we could use the name 'Ubuntu GNOME Edition'. > > > > Is t

Re: Flavor Review Request for Ubuntu GNOME

2013-03-04 Thread Allison Randal
On 03/04/2013 02:41 PM, Allison Randal wrote: > On 03/04/2013 02:14 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: >> Thanks all for the meeting today. One thing we didn't discuss was >> whether we could use the name 'Ubuntu GNOME Edition'. > > Is there a reason you want "Edition" in the name? Rather than just > "Ubuntu

Re: Flavor Review Request for Ubuntu GNOME

2013-03-04 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday, March 04, 2013 02:41:04 PM Allison Randal wrote: > On 03/04/2013 02:14 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > Thanks all for the meeting today. One thing we didn't discuss was > > whether we could use the name 'Ubuntu GNOME Edition'. > > Historically, the word "Edition" has a very specific meaning

Re: Flavor Review Request for Ubuntu GNOME

2013-03-04 Thread Allison Randal
On 03/04/2013 02:14 PM, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Thanks all for the meeting today. One thing we didn't discuss was > whether we could use the name 'Ubuntu GNOME Edition'. Historically, the word "Edition" has a very specific meaning for the Ubuntu project (briefly referenced in the trademark policy: h

Re: Flavor Review Request for Ubuntu GNOME

2013-03-04 Thread Jeremy Bicha
Thanks all for the meeting today. One thing we didn't discuss was whether we could use the name 'Ubuntu GNOME Edition'. Jeremy On 22 February 2013 15:29, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > If our request is approved, I'd also like to change our name from > 'Ubuntu GNOME Remix' to 'Ubuntu GNOME Edition'. This

Re: Flavor Review Request for Ubuntu GNOME

2013-03-04 Thread Kees Cook
Hi Jeremy, I'm in favor of this. It seems well put together. Thanks! -Kees On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:29:35PM -0500, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > Since it has been about six months since the first alpha release of > the Ubuntu GNOME Remix, I believe we are ready to ask if Ubuntu GNOME > can join the li

Apologies for this evening

2013-03-04 Thread Soren Hansen
It turns out I have a conflicting phone meeting this evening. Sorry about the short notice. -- Soren Hansen | http://linux2go.dk/ Senior Software Engineer | http://www.cisco.com/ Ubuntu Developer | http://www.ubuntu.com/ OpenStack Developer | http://www.openstack.org/ --

Apologies for this evening

2013-03-04 Thread Colin Watson
With vUDS coming up, I'm going to have my fill of evening meetings this week; and furthermore I have some fairly ugly ADSL bandwidth problems at the moment which mean that I can barely load wiki pages while doing anything else at all bandwidth-intensive, like, you know, being on IRC, so checking an