Re: [Telepathy] API sketches for encrypted channels, and OTR

2010-01-04 Thread Eitan Isaacson
Hello! I have been thinking about how we could best expose SSL verification over Telepathy to allow client interactivity. Cosimo's proposal is a good preliminary sketch of what it would look like, I hope to expand on it below, and ultimately land something in the spec. I see client interaction in

Re: [Telepathy] Requestable and Immutable properteries (was: API sketches for encrypted channels, and OTR)

2010-01-04 Thread Simon McVittie
On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 at 10:41:04 -0500, Olivier CrĂȘte wrote: > Maybe there should be a "tp:notification="" attribute on the property > tag and if its not there, then its immutable. That would force people to > have it. If we have an approach like that, it should be mandatory (for our tools), like t

Re: [Telepathy] Requestable and Immutable properteries (was: API sketches for encrypted channels, and OTR)

2010-01-04 Thread Olivier CrĂȘte
On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 13:08 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 at 08:35:58 +1100, Danielle Madeley wrote: > > This is somewhat unrelated, but do you think it's a good idea to add > > property flags to the spec for things like this, so that we can display > > this information in the

Re: [Telepathy] Requestable and Immutable properteries (was: API sketches for encrypted channels, and OTR)

2010-01-04 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 at 08:35:58 +1100, Danielle Madeley wrote: > This is somewhat unrelated, but do you think it's a good idea to add > property flags to the spec for things like this, so that we can display > this information in the top-right of the box in the spec. Something like > > If anythi