Re: [Telepathy] One big repository

2011-12-12 Thread Jonny Lamb
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 18:44 +, Jonny Lamb wrote: Basically, the idea is to throw the following Telepathy components into one repository (to rule them all): Sjoerd, Simon, and myself had another chat about this on Friday. (We were hoping Robert would also be present, given he was the big

Re: [Telepathy] One big repository

2011-12-09 Thread Guillaume Desmottes
Le jeudi 08 décembre 2011 à 15:38 +, Sjoerd Simons a écrit : * farstream * gabble * glib * logger * mission-control * qt4 * salut * spec * yell This leaves outfor example telepathy-haze and telepathy-rakia for example. Was this an oversight? If not will they be

Re: [Telepathy] One big repository

2011-12-08 Thread Sjoerd Simons
On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 18:44 +, Jonny Lamb wrote: Email is way too hard for me. What is this I don't even = Basically, the idea is to throw the following Telepathy components into one repository (to rule them all): * farstream * gabble * glib * logger

Re: [Telepathy] One big repository

2011-12-08 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 08 Dec 2011 at 15:38:58 +, Sjoerd Simons wrote: On Thu, 2011-12-01 at 18:44 +, Jonny Lamb wrote: The other big advantage of this is that we can break the D-Bus spec easily because the other components (notably tp-glib and tp-qt4) will (hopefully) continue to be in sync.

Re: [Telepathy] One big repository

2011-12-08 Thread George Kiagiadakis
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Jonny Lamb jonny.l...@collabora.co.uk wrote: Basically, the idea is to throw the following Telepathy components into one repository (to rule them all): I would advise you to think again before doing that. One of the problems at the moment is that if you make a

Re: [Telepathy] One big repository

2011-12-02 Thread Olli Salli
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Alvaro Soliverez alvaro.solive...@collabora.co.uk wrote: On Thursday 01 December 2011 22:57:35 Xavier Claessens wrote: I would make a global ./configure make. but with a --disable-foo for each submodules. I'm not sure GNOME people will like being forced to have

Re: [Telepathy] One big repository

2011-12-02 Thread Simon McVittie
On Thu, 01 Dec 2011 at 20:01:49 -0300, Alvaro Soliverez wrote: How about a global script where you can select the modules you want, and in time, the script calls each individual build system? I'd like to veto this straight away. However many flaws there might be in existing build systems, new

[Telepathy] One big repository

2011-12-01 Thread Jonny Lamb
We've already http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~jonny/telepathy/ -- Jonny Lamb ___ telepathy mailing list telepathy@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/telepathy

[Telepathy] One big repository

2011-12-01 Thread Jonny Lamb
Email is way too hard for me. What is this I don't even = Basically, the idea is to throw the following Telepathy components into one repository (to rule them all): * farstream * gabble * glib * logger * mission-control * qt4 * salut * spec * yell One of the

Re: [Telepathy] One big repository

2011-12-01 Thread Xavier Claessens
Le jeudi 01 décembre 2011 à 18:44 +, Jonny Lamb a écrit : Email is way too hard for me. What is this I don't even = Basically, the idea is to throw the following Telepathy components into one repository (to rule them all): * farstream * gabble * glib

Re: [Telepathy] One big repository

2011-12-01 Thread Alvaro Soliverez
On Thursday 01 December 2011 22:57:35 Xavier Claessens wrote: I would make a global ./configure make. but with a --disable-foo for each submodules. I'm not sure GNOME people will like being forced to have qt-dev to build telepathy The question is would KDE people be shoked if tp-qt drops