On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Robert wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 16:51 -0500, Robert wrote:
> > > Not quite. While I would love to be running mod_perl,
> > > I am limited to using CGI only. Hence the question...
> >
> > I
I can't speak to it on windows but we have been using A2 and MP2
for quite sometime now... ( upwards of a year )... anyway...
very stable... only one mp bug that hit us and a quick upgrade took
care of that...
site in question was serving about 15 gigs of data a month... so...
judge for yours
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Perrin Harkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 16:51 -0500, Robert wrote:
> > Not quite. While I would love to be running mod_perl, I am limited to using
> > CGI only. Hence the question...
>
> It's pretty unusual to be able to choose your web s
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 16:51 -0500, Robert wrote:
> Not quite. While I would love to be running mod_perl, I am limited to using
> CGI only. Hence the question...
It's pretty unusual to be able to choose your web server but not be able
to choose whether you run a specific module or not.
If you're u
On 12/22/04 1:10 PM, in article
[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Perrin Harkins"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 08:10 -0500, Robert wrote:
>> I am just wondering if CGI has a speedup with Apache2 over Apache1. I have
>> not googled anything that compares them in that way. So I was wondering
Tom Insam wrote:
On Dec 22, 2004, at 10:40, Andy Wardley wrote:
You're ignoring any error that is returned. That should be:
$tt->process(...)
|| die $tt->error();
I don't suppose I can convince you to throw $tt->error all the time, can
I? If I want to do something clever, I'll
Here here, I second that... mod_perl handlers are a massive speed
bump...
even PerlRun scripts have a bump over regular cgi.
Perrin Harkins wrote:
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 08:10 -0500, Robert wrote:
I am just wondering if CGI has a speedup with Apache2 over Apache1. I have
not goog
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Octavian Rasnita wrote:
> I have tried installing Template Toolkit using ppm after
> adding some more repositories and I have got another
> error:
>
> ppm> search Template
> ...
> 102. Template-Toolkit [2.14] a fast, flexible and extensible template
> p~
> ...
> ppm>
> pp
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 08:10 -0500, Robert wrote:
> I am just wondering if CGI has a speedup with Apache2 over Apache1. I have
> not googled anything that compares them in that way. So I was wondering if
> any of you that are using TT have moved to A2 and noticed a speedup.
Anyone who cares about
Hi,
I have tried installing Template Toolkit using ppm after adding some more
repositories and I have got another error:
ppm> search Template
...
102. Template-Toolkit [2.14] a fast, flexible and extensible template
p~
...
ppm>
ppm>install 102
No suitable target found for Template-Toolkit.
p
On Dec 22, 2004, at 10:40, Andy Wardley wrote:
You're ignoring any error that is returned. That should be:
$tt->process(...)
|| die $tt->error();
I don't suppose I can convince you to throw $tt->error all the time,
can I? If I want to do something clever, I'll eval the process st
Andy Wardley wrote:
Simon Flack wrote:
The wording of the error for the second test is a suprise - the template
exists, it's just not able to cache the compiled version.
That's the error thrown by File::Path::mkpath at line 877.
That's the third test/second error. I was referring to:
fil
Andy Wardley wrote:
Simon Flack wrote:
$tt->process($template, { data => 'Hello World' }, \$output);
You're ignoring any error that is returned. That should be:
$tt->process(...)
|| die $tt->error();
I had a 'Test::More::diag($tt->error)' a couple of lines down. I could
have
"Octavian Rasnita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Hi all,
>
> I have tried to install Template Toolkit under Windows but without
> success.
> I have tried:
>
> perl -MCPAN -e "install Template;"
>
> But I couldn't install it because it needed AppConfig module. I cou
Hi all,
I have tried to install Template Toolkit under Windows but without success.
I have tried:
perl -MCPAN -e "install Template;"
But I couldn't install it because it needed AppConfig module. I couldn't
install this module because it gave me the following errors:
AppConfig-1.56/lib/AppConfig
I am just wondering if CGI has a speedup with Apache2 over Apache1. I have
not googled anything that compares them in that way. So I was wondering if
any of you that are using TT have moved to A2 and noticed a speedup.
Robert
___
templates mailing
Simon Flack wrote:
> $tt->process($template, { data => 'Hello World' }, \$output);
You're ignoring any error that is returned. That should be:
$tt->process(...)
|| die $tt->error();
> The wording of the error for the second test is a suprise - the template
> exists, it's j
Alex Vandiver wrote:
> This (one-character!) patch has still not been applied -- just trying to
> make sure it hasn't slipped through the cracks.
It had. Thanks for the reminder. Now applied in CVS.
A
___
templates mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
htt
18 matches
Mail list logo
