[Templates] TT Without Perl

2004-10-01 Thread Dave Cross
Following a discussion on my use.perl journal[1], I'd be really interested in hearing about anyone who is using TT but not Perl - that is using templates with tpage, ttree or Apache configured with Apache::Template (or similar) such that useful applications are developed purely in TT without needin

Re: [Templates] TT Without Perl

2004-10-01 Thread Thomas Klausner
Hi! On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 02:31:48PM +0100, Dave Cross wrote: > Following a discussion on my use.perl journal[1], I'd be really > interested in hearing about anyone who is using TT but not Perl - that > is using templates with tpage, ttree or Apache configured with > Apache::Template (or similar

Re: [Templates] TT Without Perl

2004-10-01 Thread Simon Wilcox
On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Dave Cross wrote: > Following a discussion on my use.perl journal[1], I'd be really > interested in hearing about anyone who is using TT but not Perl - that > is using templates with tpage, ttree or Apache configured with > Apache::Template (or similar) such that useful applica

Re: [Templates] TT Without Perl

2004-10-01 Thread Gavin Estey
Dave Cross wrote: > Following a discussion on my use.perl journal[1], I'd be really > interested in hearing about anyone who is using TT but not Perl - that > is using templates with tpage, ttree or Apache configured with > Apache::Template (or similar) such that useful applications are > developed

Re: [Templates] TT Without Perl

2004-10-01 Thread Stephen Quinney
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 10:12:53AM -0400, Gavin Estey wrote: > Dave Cross wrote: > > Following a discussion on my use.perl journal[1], I'd be really > > interested in hearing about anyone who is using TT but not Perl - that > > is using templates with tpage, ttree or Apache configured with > > Apac

Re: [Templates] TT Without Perl

2004-10-01 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Simon" == Simon Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Simon> A great target for TT3 would be to have the language and architecture Simon> ported to different core languages so that you could run TT3 on Java or Simon> .NET. Then you'd see it pick up as a cross-platform templating language. ...

Re: [Templates] TT Without Perl

2004-10-01 Thread Harry Jackson
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: "Simon" == Simon Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Simon> A great target for TT3 would be to have the language and architecture Simon> ported to different core languages so that you could run TT3 on Java or Simon> .NET. Then you'd see it pick up as a cross-platform templ

Re: [Templates] TT Without Perl

2004-10-01 Thread Gavin Estey
Stephen Quinney wrote: > That sounds a very interesting project, is any of it open source or > available for perusal? I've been playing with C# for a while and being > able to join it up with TT could be very useful. I wasn't involved in this development, but as far as I know it was pretty straigh

Re: [Templates] TT Without Perl

2004-10-01 Thread Randal L. Schwartz
> "Harry" == Harry Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> ... if TT3 were still alive. >> Harry> Why, is it dead? I thought Andy was working away on it. or is this Harry> an, "in" joke I am missing? I heard this second-hand, not being on the tt3-devel list, but apparently TT3 is in fact

Re: [Templates] TT Without Perl

2004-10-01 Thread Andy Lester
On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 09:31:33AM -0700, Randal L. Schwartz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I heard this second-hand, not being on the tt3-devel list, but apparently > TT3 is in fact, dead. Not just resting. http://www.template-toolkit.org/pipermail/tt3/2004-July/60.html is the last message on

Re: [Templates] TT Without Perl

2004-10-01 Thread Andy Wardley
Randal L. Schwartz wrote: > ... if TT3 were still alive. It is still alive, but resting. I have a couple of deep seated design issues that I need to resolve, and they're not the kind of thing that can be rushed, or magiced out of thin air. It's true that my body has been spending more time in