We are working on automated testing tools for applications and games. We want to be able to verify various text in the UIs in different languages and have been experimenting with Tesseract OCR and having a lot of fun with it.
In 2007, Ray Smith mentioned that "Tesseract is now behind the leading commercial engines in terms of its accuracy." What commercial engines are more accurate than Tesseract and in what ways? Can Tesseract OCR approach the commercial engines with training and adjusting of parameters or is it still behind? Thanks, -Scott -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "tesseract-ocr" group. To post to this group, send email to tesseract-ocr@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tesseract-ocr+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tesseract-ocr?hl=en
