Thanks for all the responses.
It worked for me with the following preprocessing: convert -border 500
-resample 300 -density 300 -resize 300 bad2.tiff bad2.png
Actally, all the images are thresholded from one original image:
good.tiff has been thresholded manually with imagemagick at 40%
bad.tiff
I don't really want to distract from the original topic too much, but
when I tried recognizing both "good.tiff" and "bad.tiff" with my 3.02
version, only a few settings yielded something (-psm 8, primarily,
with "good.tiff"). The other times I got completely BLANK results
Coincidentally, i just re
2012/4/6 Zdenko Podobný :
> Dňa 06.04.2012 17:35, Rufus wrote / napísal(a):
>> Thanks for the reply.
>>
>> I've tried another image(bad2.tiff), which is still a bit different from
>> good.tiff, and is of the same order regarding the compression ratio.
>> However, tesseract still doesn't output anyt
Dňa 06.04.2012 17:35, Rufus wrote / napísal(a):
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I've tried another image(bad2.tiff), which is still a bit different from
> good.tiff, and is of the same order regarding the compression ratio.
> However, tesseract still doesn't output anything for bad2.tiff.
> I then tr
Just so you know, they seem to be similar but they aren't. Look at the
compression ratios between the two images.
M
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Rufus wrote:
> Issue:
> good.tiff and bad.tiff are almost identical. Infact, I've put the images
> together in mix.jpg on top of each other to make
5 matches
Mail list logo
