On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 10:07 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> hi,
>
> I've just been reading up the thread on -devel regarding the "WONTFIX".
>
> Out of curiosity, I googled "site:fedoraproject.org reporting bugs".
>
> I found 3 pages of interest. Surprisingly, none of them mention anything
> about filin
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 01:03 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> On 07/14/2010 06:25 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > I'm not making assumptions here.
> But then you go on to do exactly that:
> > Bugzillas are designed to be easy to
> > use for new reporters (at least that's the way I think of them). I'm
> >
On Wed, 14 Jul 2010 22:07:42 -0700, Adam wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 00:44 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> > I'm running F13 with updates-testing enabled. In the last two days, my
> > left mouse button has suddenly stopped working on two separate
> > occasions. I don't know what caused it and
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 00:44 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote:
> I'm running F13 with updates-testing enabled. In the last two days, my
> left mouse button has suddenly stopped working on two separate
> occasions. I don't know what caused it and the only way I was able to
> find to fix it was to kill
On 07/14/2010 06:25 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I'm not making assumptions here.
But then you go on to do exactly that:
> Bugzillas are designed to be easy to
> use for new reporters (at least that's the way I think of them). I'm
> sure upstream will not use "a bugzilla that takes several hours to f
I'm running F13 with updates-testing enabled. In the last two days, my
left mouse button has suddenly stopped working on two separate
occasions. I don't know what caused it and the only way I was able to
find to fix it was to kill my gnome-session and thus log out and log
back in with a fresh
Hi, everyone. Quick note for proven testers. I've just had a note from a
maintainer, and I've slightly updated the proven tester instructions for
packages with which the tester is unfamiliar:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Proven_tester#Unfamiliar_packages
Basically, it's really only useful to fi
When: Friday, 2010-07-16 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EST)
Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
It's that time again: blocker bug review meeting time! Friday is the
FIRST blocker bug review meeting for the Fedora 14 Alpha.
Here are the current bugs listed as blocking the Alpha release. We'll be
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 13 updates-testing
backup-manager-0.7.9-1.fc13
cairomm-1.8.4-2.fc13
compat-db-4.7.25-15.fc13
eekboard-0.0.4-2.fc13
emesene-1.6.3-1.fc13
flex-2.5.35-11.fc13
fonts-KOI8-R-1.0-13.fc13
hntool-0.1.2-1.fc13
iapetal-1.1-1
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 12 updates-testing
backup-manager-0.7.9-1.fc12
ds9-5.7-1.fc12
emesene-1.6.3-1.fc12
hntool-0.1.2-1.fc12
iapetal-1.1-1.fc12
milter-greylist-4.2.6-1200.fc12
moreutils-0.40-1.fc12
rekonq-0.5.0-1.fc12
rubygem-term-ansic
I'm not much of a web guru, but I think the Version 001 of the script
rhe reviewed which will accept the command at the command line is on my
peoplespace. See http://boblfoot.fedorapeople.org/
Feedback appreciated.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admi
2010/7/14 James Laska :
> One of the wishlist items for the QA team from Fedora 13 was to better
> understand the test coverage handled by the Fedora l10n and i18n teams.
> Looking at the link above, and not being familiar with l10n, is there a
> place that documents what the general test procedure
Greetings folks,
Just wanted to summarize how things held up for the first rawhide
acceptance test run of Fedora 14 (see task#4 [1]). Due to several
outages, boot and install images were not available until Monday, Jul
12. The rawhide acceptance test plan [2] was executed using AutoQA.
This emai
On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 12:08 -0300, Igor Pires Soares wrote:
> Hello!
>
> This week at FUDCon Santiago we are willing to update the F13 QA
> Template [1] in order to improve it for using on Fedora's next release.
> If someone has some thoughts on this please let us know.
>
> [1] https://fedoraproj
Compose started at Wed Jul 14 08:15:12 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
BackupPC-3.1.0-14.1.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so
PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requ
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 17:03:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 17:58 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:33:34 -0700
>> Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> > Luke, I really think turning on critpath requirements for everything
>> > in the world is going to prove to b
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 18:45 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Ankur, I would suggest you propose a draft rather
> than have this free form discussion where everyone would feel
> compelled
> to voice their opinions and lead it in a dozen different directions.
>
>
hey,
On it already!
regards,
Ankur
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 12:27 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 08:36 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> > This is an interesting idea. I don't think the maintainers themselves
> > would have the time to do this. Can this be passed on to the mentors, to
> > pass on as an activity for new Am
18 matches
Mail list logo
