Re: L10N QA Template for F14

2010-07-23 Thread Igor Pires Soares
Em Sex, 2010-07-23 às 15:18 +0800, He Rui escreveu: > Hi Igor, > > The template looks quite good, and I did some minor changes on it, hope > it's helpful. I found out that the tests in your template are to test > packages on desktop, so I'm curious about the language/keyboard tests in > anaconda

[Fedora QA] #110: Proventester mentor request

2010-07-23 Thread Fedora QA
#110: Proventester mentor request -+-- Reporter: biggsk | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Compo

Re: Possible new release criterion: installation boot menu

2010-07-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 14:47 -0400, James Laska wrote: > > I was just trying to cover the possibilities. For me, the appearance of > > a graphical menu is really a polish issue and doesn't fit well with > > Alpha, it seems more suited to Beta or Final. But the practical element > > is whether the b

Re: bodhi editing - QA hazard

2010-07-23 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 08:35 -0700, Matt McCutchen wrote: > On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 09:17 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > > It seems bodhi is abused more than I thought. [...] > > Why does bodhi allow editing of the package version? It seems that field > > should be locked from editing and the on

Re: bodhi editing - QA hazard

2010-07-23 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Matt McCutchen wrote: > I went down this path a while ago and was told to chill and let > maintainers use Bodhi however they wish: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-April/134671.html Hah. When one of these edited updates kills a system, will Adam and Jeff backtrack on their

Re: bodhi editing - QA hazard

2010-07-23 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Fri, 2010-07-23 at 09:17 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > It seems bodhi is abused more than I thought. [...] > Why does bodhi allow editing of the package version? It seems that field > should be locked from editing and the only course of action would be to > delete the update and create a

bodhi editing - QA hazard

2010-07-23 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Hi all, It seems bodhi is abused more than I thought. Over the past few releases of being a part-QAer for stable Fedora releases, I've noticed a trend of packagers editing updates rather drastically. Take a recent example with perl[1]. I left positive karma on perl-5.10.1-115.fc13, but then the

Re: [SoaS] [soas] problems with nightly composes build system?

2010-07-23 Thread James Laska
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 16:01 -0700, Thomas C Gilliard wrote: > I have discovered that there is a problem with the fedora-logo package > in f14(rawhide) livecd-creator builds > > With: > > fedora-livecd-soas.ks > and > fedora-livecd-desktop.ks > > If you add these lines to build; > > > # stri

rawhide report: 20100723 changes

2010-07-23 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Jul 23 08:15:20 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- BackupPC-3.1.0-14.1.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requ

Re: L10N QA Template for F14

2010-07-23 Thread He Rui
On Thu, 2010-07-22 at 16:32 -0300, Igor Pires Soares wrote: > Em Qua, 2010-07-21 às 09:34 +1000, noriko escreveu: > > James Laska さんは書きました: > > > > > > The tool is not packaged or available in fedora infrastructure. I think > > > it would be a worthwhile experiment to get familiar with the tool a