On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 19:40 -0300, Igor Pires Soares wrote:
Em Qui, 2010-07-29 às 14:53 +0800, He Rui escreveu:
On 07/29/2010 04:16 AM, Igor Pires Soares wrote:
Those tests are labeled as language tests but they are also intended for
input method testing, what is more related to i18n
#83: Clarify installer test coverage with i18n team
--+-
Reporter: jlaska | Owner: rhe
Type: enhancement | Status: closed
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:13:50 -0400
James Cassell fedoraproj...@cyberpear.com wrote:
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 17:01:36 -0400, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com
wrote:
As well as testing package installation,
we should test update notification and installation for such updates. We
can
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 12 updates-testing
atlas-3.8.3-14.fc12
dovecot-1.2.13-1.fc12
fedora-packager-0.5.1.0-1.fc12
gstreamer-java-1.4-2.fc12
gyachi-1.2.10-2.fc12
hplip-3.10.6-1.fc12
ibus-m17n-1.3.0-3.fc12
libyahoo2-1.0.1-1.fc12
Jeff Raber said the following on 07/29/2010 08:53 PM Pacific Time:
On 07/22/2010 12:07 PM, John Poelstra wrote:
As announced last week on the development list, all Fedora bugs with a
version of rawhide (with some exceptions) will be rebased to version
14 on the Fedora 14 branching date
Dear Team:
Just a suggestion from a busy proventester. When using
fedora-easy-karma it nicely provides links to the bodhi package page and
most bug reports related to the update. For packages which have special
testing requirements {kernels and PackageKit} can the link to the
testing
Either that, or include a recomended procedure with package discription?
Easily automatable, me thinks.
John Dulaney, great grandson of Arthur Sr.
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 10:34:40 -0400
From: boblf...@gmail.com
To: test@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: Proven tester special testing
As I've only done it once before on F13.
Is there a wiki, to go from F13 to F14-Branched,
F14-Rawhide to stay with Rawhide
Will it take a few days to trickle down?
--
Regards,
Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
Friend of Fedora
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
On 07/29/2010 04:01 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
A bug in PackageKit got out in a Fedora 13 update
which broke update notification, which is obviously a big problem.
PackageKit isn't actually on the critical path for F13, but it is for
F14 and up.
Is there a big tracking this? Was it
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 10:32 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
On 07/29/2010 04:01 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
A bug in PackageKit got out in a Fedora 13 update
which broke update notification, which is obviously a big problem.
PackageKit isn't actually on the critical path for
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 14 updates-testing
calibre-0.7.10-2.fc14
cifs-utils-4.6-1.fc14
compiz-0.8.6-3.fc14
googlecl-0.9.9-1.fc14
groff-1.20.1-2.fc14
ikiwiki-3.20100722-1.fc14
ldc-0.9.2-9.20100609hg1653.fc14
libass-0.9.9-1.fc14
REMINDER: This list must be clear by Tuesday (2010-08-03) to compose the
Fedora 14 Alpha Release Candidate on Thursday (2010-08-05). If blocker
bugs remain open our chances of release on time decrease rapidly.
Here's the latest!
615443 :: NEW :: livecd-tools :: Bruno Wolff III :: booting live
So, in the blocker meeting today we discussed having specific criteria
for the functionality of automated bug handling tools (currently, that
would be abrt and setroubleshoot, and I think KDE has its own tool
similar to abrt as well).
I'd like to propose the following two criteria:
* Automated
Why would we have to make it submit reports now? Unless the steps needed to
implement this are very few, there are plenty of other things that have a higher
priority right now, no?
John Dulaney
Subject: Release criteria proposal: automated bug checking tools functionality
From:
On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 21:14 -0400, John Dulaney wrote:
Why would we have to make it submit reports now? Unless the steps
needed to
implement this are very few, there are plenty of other things that
have a higher
priority right now, no?
The tools should always be capable of submitting
15 matches
Mail list logo
