Re: [Fedora QA] #112: 'Translation/Keyboard in anaconda' Test Day - 2010/09/09

2010-08-19 Thread Fedora QA
#112: 'Translation/Keyboard in anaconda' Test Day - 2010/09/09 ---+ Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component:

Re: [Fedora QA] #112: 'Translation/Keyboard in anaconda' Test Day - 2010/09/09

2010-08-19 Thread Fedora QA
#112: 'Translation/Keyboard in anaconda' Test Day - 2010/09/09 ---+ Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component:

Re: [Fedora QA] #104: F14 systemd Test Day

2010-08-19 Thread Fedora QA
#104: F14 systemd Test Day ---+ Reporter: adamwill | Owner: adamwill Type: defect| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component: Test Day | Version:

Re: [Fedora QA] #112: 'Translation/Keyboard in anaconda' Test Day - 2010/09/09

2010-08-19 Thread Fedora QA
#112: 'Translation/Keyboard in anaconda' Test Day - 2010/09/09 ---+ Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: task | Status: assigned Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 14 Component:

gedit-2.31.5-1.fc14.x86_64

2010-08-19 Thread Rob Healey
Greetings: Greetings: >Looking at koji build system, there is nothing that is greater than this t>hat has not failed! I need to have a working gedit. >I loaded livve desktop system labeled Aplha.RC3.1 live cd... >Updated system using updates-testing/14 and rawhide! Can anyone help me >get

Thanks very much

2010-08-19 Thread Eric John Nagel
The updates tonight have fixed all the issues I have had. Thanks to all the testers and a special Thanks to all the "fixers" ejn -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

gedit-2.31.5-1.fc14.x86_64

2010-08-19 Thread Rob Healey
Greetings: Looking at koji build system, there is nothing that is greater than this that has not failed! I need to have a working gedit. I loaded livve desktop system labeled Aplha.RC3.1 live cd... Updated system using updates-testing/14 and rawhide! Can anyone help me getting a working co

Re: dbus failure w/ NetworkManager-0.8.1-4git20100817 (x86_64)

2010-08-19 Thread Martin Sourada
On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 13:33 -0700, Steven I Usdansky wrote: > Running updated F14-branched w/ LXDE x86_64 desktop. Updated > NetworkManager to 0.8.1-4git20100817, but network connection failed upon > reboot. Tried calling up nm-applet manually and got the following error > (taken from /var/log/mes

dbus failure w/ NetworkManager-0.8.1-4git20100817 (x86_64)

2010-08-19 Thread Steven I Usdansky
Running updated F14-branched w/ LXDE x86_64 desktop. Updated NetworkManager to 0.8.1-4git20100817, but network connection failed upon reboot. Tried calling up nm-applet manually and got the following error (taken from /var/log/messages) Aug 19 14:55:48 Pyrope kernel: init[1]: D-Bus activation fail

[Fedora QA] #123: proventester request for shinobi

2010-08-19 Thread Fedora QA
#123: proventester request for shinobi -+-- Reporter: shinobi | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone:

Re: saved by f12

2010-08-19 Thread cornel panceac
later, i've found that adding a nameserver to resolv.conf does'nt help, so i rebooted. at the second install attempt, the mouse was still not working so i kept pressing f12 until an unhandled exception hit. at that point, "Details" was selected so i press enter, and get a "the computer will be rebo

saved by f12

2010-08-19 Thread cornel panceac
today i started to install f14 from netinst cd. the ps2 keyboard worked, fortunately, because the ps2 mouse didn't. the cursor is moving but i can not click on anything. fortunately, the old f12 trcik worked as it did since red hat linux 5. this way i saved a few tabs :) is this a known issue? one

rawhide report: 20100819 changes

2010-08-19 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Thu Aug 19 08:15:11 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 req

Re: [Fedora QA] #116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable

2010-08-19 Thread Fedora QA
#116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable ---+ Reporter: adamwill | Owner: rhe Type: defect| Status: reopened

Re: [Fedora QA] #116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable

2010-08-19 Thread Fedora QA
#116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable ---+ Reporter: adamwill | Owner: rhe Type: defect| Status: reopened

Re: [Fedora QA] #116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable

2010-08-19 Thread Fedora QA
#116: Clarify https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Mediakit_FileConflicts to say that explicit Conflicts: are acceptable ---+ Reporter: adamwill | Owner: rhe Type: defect| Status: reopened