Re: Graphical login impossible after update to "1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686" in F14

2010-09-13 Thread Steven Haigh
On 09/14/2010 03:42 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > Joachim Backes rhrk.uni-kl.de> writes: > >> >> Applying the most recent updates (including 1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686) >> prevents from a graphical login: The gdm greeter is blinking in some >> manner, no login pictures are shown, unable to select us

Re: Graphical login impossible after update to "1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686" in F14

2010-09-13 Thread Andre Robatino
Joachim Backes rhrk.uni-kl.de> writes: > > Applying the most recent updates (including 1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686) > prevents from a graphical login: The gdm greeter is blinking in some > manner, no login pictures are shown, unable to select user. > > Could go back to a stable login by downgradi

Fedora 14 updates-testing report

2010-09-13 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora 14 updates-testing ConsoleKit-0.4.2-2.fc14 bluez-4.71-2.fc14 elfutils-0.149-1.fc14 fedora-logos-14.0.0-1.fc14 generic-logos-14.0-1.fc14 glibmm24-2.24.2-1.fc14 gtkmm24-2.21.7-2.fc14 hal-0.5.14-5.fc14 initscripts-9.2

Re: Printing to PCL printers.

2010-09-13 Thread Steven Haigh
On 09/13/2010 11:33 AM, Maximi89 wrote: > Same problem here, when i send a file to the printer, the printer try to > print like half second and then stop, but the file appears like > printed... in my case my printer is a HP P1005, using FOO2XQX driver, > who uses ghostscript, but ghostscript have a

Introduction

2010-09-13 Thread Marcos Tirao
Hi guys, I'm very glad to join at Fedora Bug Zappers Team. I have working a lot with Fedora and Red Hat Linux since some years ago. So, now a really wants contribute with the project. I have a lot of experience working as a linux developer at IBM. In the past I worked as system administrator at

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-13 Thread Michal Jaegermann
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 09:27:33PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 09/13/2010 08:17 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > See, for example, > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624316 > > which kills video after suspend on a particular laptop running F12 > > and F13 but which mai

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 21:27 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > I'm not so sure we have any Intel ninja on board with us so.. > ( we got David for radeon and Ben for nouveau ) Intel keeps hiring them away from us =) For now, Adam Jackson looks after the intel driver for us, but he's not reall

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-13 Thread Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
On 09/13/2010 08:17 PM, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > See, for example, > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=624316 > which kills video after suspend on a particular laptop running F12 > and F13 but which maintainer does not want to touch. There is a > patch there. It can be argued that t

Re: redraw issues with intel x driver.

2010-09-13 Thread drago01
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 7:51 PM, Steven Haigh wrote: > On 09/13/2010 02:27 AM, Tom London wrote: >> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Steven Haigh  wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I've just subscribed to the list so I apologise if this has already been >>> looked at in previous months (I didn't find any

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-13 Thread Michal Jaegermann
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 08:38:26PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:24 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:53:01PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 15:34 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:31 -04

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 13:24 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:53:01PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 15:34 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:31 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > > > > > > > There would probably be more bu

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-13 Thread Michal Jaegermann
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 03:53:01PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 15:34 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:31 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > > > > > There would probably be more bugs reported with suspend if the > > > 'components' > > > field in bu

Re: Fedora 14 Beta Blocker Meeting :: Friday, 2010-09-10 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT)

2010-09-13 Thread John Poelstra
John Poelstra said the following on 09/09/2010 05:19 PM Pacific Time: > When: Friday, 2010-09-10 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT) > Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net > > Without these bugs fixed we can't compose the Fedora 14 Beta Release > Candidate on 2010-09-16. > ==

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-13 Thread Kjartan Maraas
ma., 13.09.2010 kl. 20.34 +0200, skrev Kjartan Maraas: > lø., 11.09.2010 kl. 22.24 -0400, skrev Jonathan Kamens: > > (I've been unsubscribed for a month or so because of other business > > consuming all my time, so forgive me if I'm beating a dead horse.) > > > > I just upgraded to F14. I'm really

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-13 Thread Kjartan Maraas
lø., 11.09.2010 kl. 22.24 -0400, skrev Jonathan Kamens: > (I've been unsubscribed for a month or so because of other business > consuming all my time, so forgive me if I'm beating a dead horse.) > > I just upgraded to F14. I'm really not impressed at its current > quality level and I find it hard

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 14:06 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > On 9/12/2010 3:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Sorry to hear you're having trouble. Let's take a look through the bugs. > > I can't reply in line as Evo is being too 'clever' about your table, > Hmm. Maybe you should file a bug about tha

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 14:06:36 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > I will try to do that, but it is somewhat disheartening, because > feedback I've seen here and in bugzilla in the past suggests that the > nouveau driver is not particularly well-maintained and isn't likely to > be any time soon. W

Re: root password required 3 times to add a printer

2010-09-13 Thread Tim Waugh
On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 03:37 +1000, Steven Haigh wrote: > Is this how it should be? Not for desktop_admin_r users, no: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596711 Tim. */ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-13 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 14:06:36 -0400, Jonathan Kamens wrote: > > 632932 - no points for h264 format video ;) > Why? Is there a patent issue? It's the default codec VLC uses when doing > screen captures, and it's also by far the best codec I've found for > capturing this sort of thing. Is there

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-13 Thread Jonathan Kamens
On 9/12/2010 3:27 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > Sorry to hear you're having trouble. Let's take a look through the bugs. > I can't reply in line as Evo is being too 'clever' about your table, Hmm. Maybe you should file a bug about that. ;-) > 632939 - as Lennart says, seems a bit confused; if you c

Re: root password required 3 times to add a printer

2010-09-13 Thread Michał Piotrowski
Something similar occurs in yumex. I enter the password, install some packages. After installation, I get the message "do you want to end the use of yumex?" (or something like that). When I choose "no" I get another root password monit. And so it goes, on and on after install/update. Usability dis

Re: Please test basic video driver in 14 Beta TC1

2010-09-13 Thread Adam Jackson
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 20:15 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 23:55:19 + (UTC) > Andre Robatino wrote: > > > I've reported > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632805 > > Could be the same as this one: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627073 It's

root password required 3 times to add a printer

2010-09-13 Thread Steven Haigh
Is this how it should be? I believe the root password should only be asked for once throughout the process. At the moment, I need to enter the root password as soon as I hit the add printer button for: org.fedoraproject.config.firewall.auth Then again for org.opensuse.cupspkhelper.mechanism.de

Upcoming Fedora 14 Tasks

2010-09-13 Thread John Poelstra
Start End Name Tue 24-Aug Tue 14-Sep Alpha Testing Thu 09-Sep Wed 15-Sep Test Beta 'Test Compose' Tue 14-Sep Tue 14-Sep End of Alpha Testing Tue 14-Sep Tue 14-Sep Beta Change Deadline Tue 14-Sep Tue 14-Sep Features 100% Complete Deadline Thu 16-Sep Thu 23-Sep Test Beta Can

RE: Graphical login impossible after update to "1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686" in F14

2010-09-13 Thread Jonathan Kamens
Another workaround for this issue is to configure GDM to do automatic login (assuming that you always log in as the same user). I have had automatic login configured for the longest time, and I didn't even notice the problem. Put this in the [daemon] section of /etc/gdm/custom.conf to enable aut

Re: Graphical login impossible after update to "1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686" in F14

2010-09-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 18:12 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > Nevermind. I'll upgrade this system later - maybe gdm problem has been fixed. Just downgrade gdm instead. -4, from koji, works fine. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT

Re: Graphical login impossible after update to "1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686" in F14

2010-09-13 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/13 Tom Horsley : > On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:37:50 +0200 > Michał Piotrowski wrote: > >> I changed /etc/sysconfig/desktop to KDE, KDM and GDM is still used. > > Did you reboot? Twice. > I've found that someone, somewhere, knows something > about the desktop login that isn't corrected by merel

Re: Graphical login impossible after update to "1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686" in F14

2010-09-13 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:37:50 +0200 Michał Piotrowski wrote: > I changed /etc/sysconfig/desktop to KDE, KDM and GDM is still used. Did you reboot? I've found that someone, somewhere, knows something about the desktop login that isn't corrected by merely logging out and back in. You might also nee

Re: Graphical login impossible after update to "1:gdm-2.31.90-5.fc14.i686" in F14

2010-09-13 Thread Michał Piotrowski
2010/9/11 Tom Horsley : > On Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:38:12 -0400 > Clyde E. Kunkel wrote: > >> reverting gdm et al from koji works around this > > Switching to KDM probably also works, since I haven't > had any login problems and I've been using KDM all along. I changed /etc/sysconfig/desktop to K

F-14 Branched report: 20100913 changes

2010-09-13 Thread Branched Report
Compose started at Mon Sep 13 13:15:33 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires /usr/local/bin/php RackTables-0.18.3-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(File::FnMatch) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc1

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 15:34 +0100, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:31 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > It varies, as it always does. For me personally, it's reasonably good; I > > > have a couple of issues with nouveau and suspend but aside from th

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 10:31 -0400, Bill Davidsen wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > > It varies, as it always does. For me personally, it's reasonably good; I > > have a couple of issues with nouveau and suspend but aside from that I'm > > okay. > > There would probably be more bugs reported wit

Re: Not too impressed with the quality of F14 at this time

2010-09-13 Thread Bill Davidsen
Adam Williamson wrote: > It varies, as it always does. For me personally, it's reasonably good; I > have a couple of issues with nouveau and suspend but aside from that I'm > okay. There would probably be more bugs reported with suspend if the 'components' field in bugzilla had a place to put th

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Beta Blocker Meeting :: Friday, 2010-09-10 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT)

2010-09-13 Thread Tom Horsley
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 09:21:41 -0400 James Laska wrote: > I've added this to F14Blocker as hard drive installs are covered under > the final release criteria... I tested the hard drive install at the same time I was testing the vesa driver, and hard drive install was indeed working OK in TC1 (as w

Re: [Test-Announce] Preupgrade Test Day 2010-09-02 Recap

2010-09-13 Thread James Laska
On Mon, 2010-09-06 at 16:22 +0800, He Rui wrote: > Greetings, > > Many thanks for the ones who attended this test day, though we don't > have much attendance, the general tests for preupgrade have been nicely > covered with its bugs filed and verified. > > The common issue testers encountered d

Re: 2010-09-13 @ ** 15:00 UTC ** - Fedora QA meeting

2010-09-13 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 09:24 -0400, James Laska wrote: > # Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting > # Date: 2010-09-13 > # Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 17:00 CEST) [1] > # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net > > Greetings testers, > > Unfortunately, I'm not available for the meeting today. Is

2010-09-13 @ ** 15:00 UTC ** - Fedora QA meeting

2010-09-13 Thread James Laska
ki/QA/Meetings/20100913 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 14 Beta Blocker Meeting :: Friday, 2010-09-10 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT)

2010-09-13 Thread James Laska
Thanks for the feedback Tom, comments below. On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 21:59 -0400, Tom Horsley wrote: > This one seemed pretty bad to me: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627073 > > Maybe the ATI problem is fixed now (it sort of seemed like > it might already have been fixed but didn

Corrupt gnome-panel notification icons with auto-hide.

2010-09-13 Thread Steven Haigh
Has anyone seen this? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626046 In a nutshell, if the gnome-panel is in the process of a hide/show animation when the notification panel is loaded, the notification icons are corrupted. This only seems to be able to be corrected with a logout/login. Th

GDM themes.

2010-09-13 Thread Steven Haigh
Hi all, Does anyone know whats happening with the GDM login screens? The themes available don't seem to work properly - and I can't seem to find any easy way to change the GDM themes as per RHEL/CentOS etc... I heard somewhere that GDM is being replaced with something - but no more details

Re: Release criteria proposal: fedora release artwork

2010-09-13 Thread James Laska
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 09:49 -0400, James Laska wrote: > = Fedora 14 Alpha = > * The default Fedora artwork used must either refer to the current > Fedora release under development (Fedora 14), or reference an interim > release milestone (e.g. Alpha or Beta). If a release version number > is > use

rawhide report: 20100913 changes

2010-09-13 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Sep 13 08:15:27 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 avogadro-libs-1.0.1-6.fc15.i686 requires sip-api(7) >= 0:7.1 avogadro-libs-1.0.1-