#129: Replace installer telnet test case with newer ssh support
--+-
Reporter: jlaska | Owner: rhe
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor| Milestone: Fedora 14
According to one of the VirtualBox developers (Frank Mehnert), bugs
621893 (VirtualBox) and 623956 (KVM) may actually be the same bug in
Xorg affecting VESA 2.0. He filed an upstream bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30585
which was closed as a duplicate of
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 13:10 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 4 października 2010 00:16 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
W dniu 3 października 2010 23:58 użytkownik Bruno Wolff III
br...@wolff.to napisał:
There
was some recent security updates that affected
W dniu 4 października 2010 00:16 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
W dniu 3 października 2010 23:58 użytkownik Bruno Wolff III
br...@wolff.to napisał:
There
was some recent security updates that affected pretty much all versions.
I haven't run into any f14 specific
2010/10/4 James Laska jla...@redhat.com:
The blocker list is always a good reference to answer that question.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=F14Blockerhide_resolved=1
Thanks.
It seems that nothing on this list is relevant for this system.
Thanks,
James
Regards,
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 23:35 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I'm thinking about upgrade of my devel (php, python2, python3,
postgres, mysql, firebird, cherokee, apache, git, some xorg related
libs etc) system from F13 to F14Beta+. I've seen recently some bug
reports about serious bugs
W dniu 4 października 2010 13:10 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
Apart from that it seems that everything went well.
I can not upgrade my system after this preupgrade update. Anyone else
has this problem?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=639960
BTW. I've got
Compose started at Mon Oct 4 08:15:25 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit)
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
2010/10/4 James Laska jla...@redhat.com:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 15:28 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/10/4 James Laska jla...@redhat.com:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 13:10 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 4 października 2010 00:16 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
Thanks for posting your logs. See comments below.
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 16:26 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/10/4 James Laska jla...@redhat.com:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 15:28 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/10/4 James Laska jla...@redhat.com:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 13:10 +0200,
EXT4 filesystem directory with 100,000+ small files, 4-core intel
processor, batch process that runs parallel on all four processors
... adding/deleting several hundred files.
No problem on F13 but fairly consistently happens since recent
preupgrade to F14. If I serialize the processing, problem
2010/10/4 James Laska jla...@redhat.com:
Thanks for posting your logs. See comments below.
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 16:26 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/10/4 James Laska jla...@redhat.com:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 15:28 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2010/10/4 James Laska
2010/10/4 James Laska jla...@redhat.com:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 14:44 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 4 października 2010 13:10 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
mkkp...@gmail.com napisał:
Apart from that it seems that everything went well.
I can not upgrade my system after this
CC'ing kernel list
Regards,
Michal
2010/10/4 Anne Lynn Wheeler l...@garlic.com:
EXT4 filesystem directory with 100,000+ small files, 4-core intel
processor, batch process that runs parallel on all four processors
... adding/deleting several hundred files.
Let me guess - fsfuzzer? :)
No
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 20:56 -0400, Janina Sajka wrote:
Hi,
Jon Hermansen writes:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Janina Sajka jan...@rednote.net wrote:
Seems telnet installs are again broken. I've filed bug 639629 Submitted
- Installation over telnet isn't working
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 17:21 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
It seemed to me that preupgrade process should not require any user
interactions. I've used this tool twice on this system and I do not
recall that I had to provide any user input.
Preupgrade should, preupgrade itself is the tool that
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 09:50 -0400, Andre Robatino wrote:
According to one of the VirtualBox developers (Frank Mehnert), bugs
621893 (VirtualBox) and 623956 (KVM) may actually be the same bug in
Xorg affecting VESA 2.0. He filed an upstream bug
Adam Jackson ajax at redhat.com writes:
632805,
No, this is a PanelID bug and should already be fixed in xorg-x11-server
1.9.0-9.
I already tested the corresponding F13 build, and it didn't work - see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=632805#c39
Unfortunately I can't test the
2010/10/4 Michal Jaegermann mic...@harddata.com:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 02:44:00PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
e2fsprogs-1.41.10-7.fc13.i686 has missing requires of libss.so.2
e2fsprogs-1.41.12-5.fc13.x86_64 is a duplicate with
e2fsprogs-1.41.10-7.fc13.x86_64
Is there any way to
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 16:16 +0100, mike cloaked wrote:
This presumes the key is already formatted with a boot flag set. The
documentation is just not clear enough to be easily understandable
even by experienced Fedora users (I have been with Fedora since its
inception!)
And you don't know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/04/2010 02:20 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 14:49 -0400, John Poelstra wrote:
Start End Name
Tue 28-Sep Mon 18-Oct Beta Testing
Thu 07-Oct Wed 13-Oct Pre-RC Acceptance Test Plan
Fri 08-Oct Fri 08-Oct
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 11:18 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 02:44:00PM +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
e2fsprogs-1.41.10-7.fc13.i686 has missing requires of libss.so.2
e2fsprogs-1.41.12-5.fc13.x86_64 is a duplicate with
e2fsprogs-1.41.10-7.fc13.x86_64
Is
#138: critpath lacks proventester attention since a month
---+
Reporter: nphilipp | Owner:
Type: proventester request | Status: closed
Priority: major |
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 22:46 +0100, mike cloaked wrote:
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 16:16 +0100, mike cloaked wrote:
This presumes the key is already formatted with a boot flag set. The
documentation is just not clear
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 02:51:04PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 11:18 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote:
Running 'package-cleanup --cleandupes' would likely help. After
I'd highly recommend being very cautious about that, because what this
seems to do is actually
Hi,
can anybody explain it ?
After fresh Fedora install (from Fedora repo only) I found in
/var/log/messages records as:
Oct 1 07:08:26 ns kernel: [ cut here ]
Oct 1 07:08:26 ns kernel: WARNING: at lib/dma-debug.c:791
check_unmap+0x7a/0x59b()
Oct 1 07:08:26 ns kernel:
James Laska writes:
Andre correctly reminded me that 'ssh' installer support is not intended
as a replacement for a telnet install. Rather, it is a means for
enabling 'ssh' to remotely monitor install progress. Translation, you
can ssh into the installing system and monitor /tmp/*log or do
27 matches
Mail list logo
