Le 08/10/2010 21:18, stan a écrit :
> PHP Warning: PHP Startup: Unable to load dynamic library
> '/usr/lib64/php/modules/gv.so' - /usr/lib64/php/modules/gv.so: undefined
> symbol: zend_error_noreturn in Unknown on line 0
At least this should be reported against "graphviz" (grap
Is it spam, for real ? (sigh!)
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Nick Cradock wrote:
> http://RadioGrandeFratello.com/mas6.html
>
> --
> test mailing list
> test@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
>
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fed
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 17:05 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> Oh your right. Lemme rethink if there is a better way to articulate my
> thoughts. I was searching for a generic way to say, potentially
> disruptive changes to core packages aren't a good fit for NTH. The NTH
> xorg bug#596557 discussed d
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 15:49 -0400, Timothy Davis wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 09:47 -0400, Timothy Davis wrote:
> > I have noticed a lot of critical paths are still in F12 and F13
> > I have F12 and F13 DVD that I can install and test with, I think I
> > have a partition or two to test mdadm with
http://RadioGrandeFratello.com/mas6.html
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 12:42 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 11:23 -0400, James Laska wrote:
>
> > > Would it be overkill to put more explicit testing sign-off around NTH
> > > bugs?
> >
> > I don't see why not. I think this topic came up in a previous mail.
> > I'd propose
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 09:47 -0400, Timothy Davis wrote:
> I have noticed a lot of critical paths are still in F12 and F13
> I have F12 and F13 DVD that I can install and test with, I think I
> have a partition or two to test mdadm with as well.
That would be great. Are you a proven tester yet?
No
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 11:23 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> > Would it be overkill to put more explicit testing sign-off around NTH bugs?
>
> I don't see why not. I think this topic came up in a previous mail.
> I'd propose that NTH bugs must be tested and have appropriate bodhi
> karma for them to
=
#fedora-bugzappers: Fedora 14 Blocker Bug Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=538277&hide_resolved=1
===
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 07:12 -0400, John Poelstra wrote:
> Adam Williamson said the following on 10/07/2010 01:24 PM Pacific Time:
> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/QA:SOP_nth_process_nth_draft
> >>> is a proposed new page which covers the whole nice-to-have review process
> >>> m
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:42:26 +0200
Remi Collet wrote:
> 2/ yum update
>
> And a full yum transaction output
>
There was a broken package in the prior update (paraview) and rather
than take it out, I just left it in. It only adds a few lines.
The error for php-pear-CAS occurred after I hit ctr
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:42:26 +0200
Remi Collet wrote:
> Could you provides the installed php extension list ?
>
> rpm -qa php\* | sort
Some of these are packages that trigger the problem. RPM thinks they
are installed, though yum thinks they aren't complete.
Note the two installed pack
Le 08/10/2010 16:40, stan a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I installed F14 x86_64 from the Beta DVD this week. When I updated the
> huge number of packages I normally install, I found that whenever
> certain php-pear packages or the php-channel-doctrine package are
> installed or updated, yum fires off php an
[ 1511.087] Segmentation fault at address 0x28
[ 1511.087]
Fatal server error:
[ 1511.087] Caught signal 11 (Segmentation fault). Server aborting
[ 1511.087]
[ 1511.087]
Does anyone else running a Rawhide KVM guest see this, and if so, any idea what
component(s) to report it under? I have all
#86: Add test coverage for text-mode upgrade
--+-
Reporter: jlaska | Owner: rhe
Type: enhancement | Status: assigned
Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 14
Componen
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 09:47 -0400, Timothy Davis wrote:
> I have noticed a lot of critical paths are still in F12 and F13
> I have F12 and F13 DVD that I can install and test with, I think I
> have a partition or two to test mdadm with as well.
That would be great. Are you a proven tester yet?
--
On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 07:12 -0400, John Poelstra wrote:
> On the other hand it has taken us a *long* time to get to the place
> where we are today where churn in RC has been reduced to a bare minimum.
> I still subscribe to the theory (realizing some in Fedora don't) that
> every additional c
Compose started at Fri Oct 8 13:15:20 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
almanah-0.7.3-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.10()(64bit)
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
frysk-0.
Hi,
I installed F14 x86_64 from the Beta DVD this week. When I updated the
huge number of packages I normally install, I found that whenever
certain php-pear packages or the php-channel-doctrine package are
installed or updated, yum fires off php and it runs using over 90% of
CPU, and seemingly d
Dear Fedora Comunity,
We would like to draw your attention to forthcoming Fedora Test Day focused on
OpenLDAP [1] with TLS encryption.
The crypto implementation for TLS/SSL was recently changed from OpenSSL to
Mozilla Network Security Services (MozNSS). And there are 88 packages
depending on open
I have noticed a lot of critical paths are still in F12 and F13
I have F12 and F13 DVD that I can install and test with, I think I
have a partition or two to test mdadm with as well.
--
test mailing list
test@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo
Compose started at Fri Oct 8 08:15:19 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
antlr3-python-3.1.2-7.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6
clutter-gst-devel-1.2.0-1.fc15.i686 requires pkgconfig(clutter-1.0) <
0:1.3.0
cl
Adam Williamson said the following on 10/07/2010 01:24 PM Pacific Time:
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/QA:SOP_nth_process_nth_draft
>>> is a proposed new page which covers the whole nice-to-have review process
>>> much as the above proposed page covers the blocker review process
On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:30:00 -0700, Adam wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-06 at 15:34 +0200, Jan Vcelak wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > please, test following critical path updates:
>
> I'm wondering if we should reach out to forums and users@ list to find
> users of previous stable releases who can be proven
24 matches
Mail list logo
