Hi guys,
I am Rahul. Work for 3DPLM software solutions Ltd. Pune.
I am working with C , C++ for last 8 to 10 years. Also worked on
Assembly language and Embedded programming on AVR MC.
I am working on linux for last few years and fan of open source
movement. Want to contribute to the project.
I was doing some critpath checking. I happened to notice that at-spi
somehow had two versions on Bodhi. The first version, at-spi-1.32.0-1.fc14
(
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/at-spi-1.32.0-1.fc14?_csrf_token=6f780264b621481514418721ff4f5e208235a612),
was pushed to testing and the cr
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> W.R.T. the Fedora bug, any provenpackager will do. Hey, wait, I'm one.
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2549666
Thanks. I'm just a regular packager. :P
>
> (Not intending to push this for F-14 myself, but if someone wants to
> go ahead and do it as
Michael Cronenworth (m...@cchtml.com) said:
> > It's almost certianly to own the directory... s-c-keyboard should be
> > fixed to just dual-own it.
>
> There's a bug[1] as old as 2007 open for this. Who would be the right
> people to poke to fix this simple spec issue? There's a Fedora one[2]
>
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> It's almost certianly to own the directory... s-c-keyboard should be
> fixed to just dual-own it.
>
There's a bug[1] as old as 2007 open for this. Who would be the right
people to poke to fix this simple spec issue? There's a Fedora one[2]
open as well.
[1] https://bug
Steven I Usdansky (usdans...@rocketmail.com) said:
> ~$ rpm -e --test firstboot
> error: Failed dependencies:
> firstboot is needed by (installed)
> system-config-keyboard-1.3.1-2.fc14.x86_64
> Not that I normally need to reconfigure my keyboard, but this doesn't seem
> right. Also, this is
~$ rpm -e --test firstboot
error: Failed dependencies:
firstboot is needed by (installed)
system-config-keyboard-1.3.1-2.fc14.x86_64
Not that I normally need to reconfigure my keyboard, but this doesn't seem
right. Also, this is not the first time it's come up:
http://lists.fedoraproject.or
Original Message
Subject:experimental systemd + initscripts repo
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:43:33 -0400
From: Bill Nottingham
Reply-To: Development discussions related to Fedora
To: de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
I've set up a repo on r.fp.org:
http://
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clamav-0.96.3-1400.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomcat6-6.0.26-11.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/sepostgresql-9.0.0-20101005.fc13
https://admin.fedoraproject
The following Fedora 12 Security updates need testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/clamav-0.96.3-1200.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bzip2-1.0.6-1.fc12
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/subversion-1.6.13-1.fc12.1
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updat
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 13:22 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> James Laska (jla...@redhat.com) said:
> > Yeah we can remove that pre-F9 instruction.
> >
> > Either I wrote that command incorrectly, or 'initctl' used to default to
> > the 'list' action. Either way, I've updated the command per your
===
#fedora-bugzappers: Fedora 14 Final Blocker Review http://bit.ly/aBqOcu
===
Meeting started by poelcat at 16:01:15 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http:/
James Laska (jla...@redhat.com) said:
> Yeah we can remove that pre-F9 instruction.
>
> Either I wrote that command incorrectly, or 'initctl' used to default to
> the 'list' action. Either way, I've updated the command per your
> suggestion. Let me know if that makes sense.
... and it will al
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 10:53 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Steven I Usdansky wrote:
> > Looks like something is missing in openbox 3.4.11.2-5.fc14
> > yum upgrade openbox now wants to install metacity to satisfy
> > the firstboot(windowmanager) dependency
>
> Might want to check out your --ch
Steven I Usdansky wrote:
> Looks like something is missing in openbox 3.4.11.2-5.fc14
> yum upgrade openbox now wants to install metacity to satisfy
> the firstboot(windowmanager) dependency
Might want to check out your --changelog. :)
Per the changelog: https://bugzila.redhat.com/643416
Looks l
Compose started at Fri Oct 22 13:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
qtgpsc-0.2.3-6.fc12.x86_64 requires libgps.so.18()(64bit)
rakudo-0.0.2010.08_2.7.0-1.fc14.x86_64 requires
libparrot.so.2.7.0()(64bit)
Broken deps fo
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 08:10:24 -0700,
John Poelstra wrote:
>
> When: TODAY, 2010-10-22 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT/9 AM PDT)
> Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
I'll be around, but might get interrupted from time to time.
> 645606 [NEW --- - urgent - assigned to mcla...@redhat.com -T
When: TODAY, 2010-10-22 @ 16:00 UTC (12 PM EDT/9 AM PDT)
Where: #fedora-bugzappers on irc.freenode.net
We need to keep testing and resolving blocker bugs before the "Go/No-Go
Meeting" on Tuesday, October 26, 2010.
Discuss the open blocker bugs: http://bit.ly/aBqOcu
645283 [NEW --- - medium -
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 08:05 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_User_Interface_serial_console
>
> Does this work for you?
>
> "When using upstart (Fedora9), you may confirm that the serial device is
> configured for login by examining the output of init
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 13:54 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 10/22/2010 01:29 PM, James Laska wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 03:24 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> >> Hving given up on Revisor, I looked at pungi.py and stuff and see that
> >> it really wants a kickstart file?
> >>
> >>
Looks like something is missing in openbox 3.4.11.2-5.fc14
yum upgrade openbox now wants to install metacity to satisfy
the firstboot(windowmanager) dependency
~$ rpm -q --provides openbox
config(openbox) = 3.4.11.2-4.fc14.1
firstboot(windowmanager)
openbox = 3.4.11.2-4.fc14.1
openbox(x86-64) =
On 10/22/2010 01:29 PM, James Laska wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 03:24 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
>> Hving given up on Revisor, I looked at pungi.py and stuff and see that
>> it really wants a kickstart file?
>>
>> Are these the kickstart files in the spins-ks package (whatever its
>> real na
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 03:24 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote:
> Hving given up on Revisor, I looked at pungi.py and stuff and see that
> it really wants a kickstart file?
>
> Are these the kickstart files in the spins-ks package (whatever its
> real name is)?
>
> Is there currently a tool to make ki
On 10/21/2010 10:11 AM, Valent Turkovic wrote:
> Your message reads to me like no matter what you don't wan't any bug
> reports even if they help Fedora and like you are trying to start a
> flame.
That's very interesting.
Care to explain how you reach that conclusion that I of all people don't
w
Compose started at Fri Oct 22 08:15:03 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
ScientificPython-2.8-11.fc14.x86_64 requires libmpi.so.0()(64bit)
ScientificPython-2.8-11.fc14.x86_64 requires libopen-rte.so.0()(64bit)
Scienti
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 1:05 PM, Kamil Paral wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_User_Interface_serial_console
>
> Does this work for you?
>
> "When using upstart (Fedora9), you may confirm that the serial device is
> configured for login by examining the output of initctl
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_User_Interface_serial_console
Does this work for you?
"When using upstart (Fedora9), you may confirm that the serial device is
configured for login by examining the output of initctl."
"initctl" itself doesn't work, "initctl list" seems to do w
27 matches
Mail list logo
