Re: fedora documentation me appear ????

2010-11-01 Thread Saurabh Sharma
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 9:44 PM, Kjartan Maraas wrote: > sø., 31.10.2010 kl. 17.38 -0400, skrev Genes MailLists: >> On 10/31/2010 03:54 PM, stan wrote: >> >> > What is strange is that when I turn on javascript, the Fedora 13 logo >> > has scroll bars on it under some circumstances. >> > >> >>   Loo

Re: Firefox 3.6, open pdf outside of browser

2010-11-01 Thread stan
On Mon, 1 Nov 2010 21:25:39 -0600 > Michal Jaegermann wrote: > If you have mozplugger installed then you can set your viewer in > /etc/mozpluggerrc. It tries whatever is configured there in order > until it will find the first one which works. If you do not like > "swallowing" then do not use '

Re: Fw: Firefox 3.6, open pdf outside of browser

2010-11-01 Thread Michal Jaegermann
On Mon, Nov 01, 2010 at 07:47:22PM -0700, stan wrote: > On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:14:19 -0400 > > Richard Ryniker wrote: > > > > Click: Edit -> Preferences -> Applications > > > > Find the line in the first column (Content Type) for "PDF file" and > > select your desired program. I had to select

[Fedora QA] #149: Mentor Request

2010-11-01 Thread Fedora QA
#149: Mentor Request -+-- Reporter: hellork | Owner: Type: proventester request | Status: new Priority: minor| Milestone: Component: Proven

Re: Fresh install, no network

2010-11-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
This just in: the problem fixed itself magically, Must be because yesterday was Halloween since I have no other explanation, rational or otherwise. What happened was this: Despite no net, I wanted to recover some files from my backup NAS, so I booted with the F13 (note, not F14) rescue disk, which

Fw: Firefox 3.6, open pdf outside of browser

2010-11-01 Thread stan
On Mon, 01 Nov 2010 22:14:19 -0400 > Richard Ryniker wrote: > > Click: Edit -> Preferences -> Applications > > Find the line in the first column (Content Type) for "PDF file" and > select your desired program. I had to select "Use other" and > navigate to my preference, acroread; you should ch

Re: Firefox 3.6, open pdf outside of browser

2010-11-01 Thread Richard Ryniker
Sorry; finger check: "RDF file" should be "PDF file"; corrected below. Click: Edit -> Preferences -> Applications Find the line in the first column (Content Type) for "PDF file" and select your desired program. I had to select "Use other" and navigate to my preference, acroread; you should ch

Re: Firefox 3.6, open pdf outside of browser

2010-11-01 Thread Richard Ryniker
Click: Edit -> Preferences -> Applications Find the line in the first column (Content Type) for "RDF file" and select your desired program. I had to select "Use other" and navigate to my preference, acroread; you should choose your preferred application. -- test mailing list test@lists.fedorap

Firefox 3.6, open pdf outside of browser

2010-11-01 Thread stan
When Firefox updated to 3.6 in F14, for some reason pdfs now open inside the browser. I don't like that behavior and would like to change it, but can't find anything definitive about how to do that. I use whatever the default pdf viewer is, and I think what I have to find is the configuration for

Re: Fresh install, no network

2010-11-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 14:58 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:06:53PM -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:46 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > > > > The first "sanity check" is to configure your network interface > > > static to make sure tha

Re: Preupgrade change?

2010-11-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 20:10 +, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 1 November 2010 17:20, Adam Williamson wrote: > > A few days after would be rather bad and should have been previously > > clearly communicated, given that preupgrade is one of our official 'Good > > Ways To Upgrade' and lots of people

Re: How to start with testing??

2010-11-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 15:00 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > xcieja wrote: > > I have just joined Fedora Community, and i would like to ask how does > > testing look here ?? > > Can anyone focus on the part he/she is interested in and test it or is > > there any person who take care, prepares te

Fedora 12 updates-testing report

2010-11-01 Thread updates
The following Fedora 12 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/bzip2-1.0.6-1.fc12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glpi-0.72.4-3.svn11497.fc12 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-xcf-thumbnailer-1.0-4.fc12 https://admin.fedoraproject

Fedora 13 updates-testing report

2010-11-01 Thread updates
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/glpi-0.72.4-3.svn11497.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/banshee-1.6.1-4.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-libwww-perl-5.837-2.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.

Fedora 14 updates-testing report

2010-11-01 Thread updates
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mailman-2.1.13-6.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/moodle-1.9.10-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cvs-1.11.23-11.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mono

Re: Fresh install, no network

2010-11-01 Thread Michal Jaegermann
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:06:53PM -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:46 -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > > The first "sanity check" is to configure your network interface > > static to make sure that the basic hardware/driver are healthy. > > One thing at a time. > >

Re: F14 - Changing GDM Background

2010-11-01 Thread stan
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 18:07:40 -0600 > Michal Jaegermann wrote: > Errr..., the original question from Sawrub was about a gdm > background and not backgrounds for Gnome desktops. > My bad. It worked for me on F12, and I thought I'd used wallpapoz. Obviously not. -- test mailing list test@lists.

Re: Preupgrade change?

2010-11-01 Thread James Laska
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 13:25 -0400, Jan Wildeboer wrote: > (Sorry for top-posting, blame blackberry and me) > > IMHO - if preupgrade doesn't work for those running F13 - it would be a > blocker for F14 release IMHO. Not to worry, see #10 on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_14_Beta_Release_Cri

Re: Preupgrade change?

2010-11-01 Thread Richard Hughes
On 1 November 2010 17:20, Adam Williamson wrote: > A few days after would be rather bad and should have been previously > clearly communicated, given that preupgrade is one of our official 'Good > Ways To Upgrade' and lots of people want to upgrade on release day. If > there's a significant chance

Re: [Fedora QA] #147: Ratify Fedora 15 Schedule

2010-11-01 Thread Fedora QA
#147: Ratify Fedora 15 Schedule ---+ Reporter: poelstra | Owner: jlaska Type: task | Status: new Priority: critical | Milestone: Fedora 15 Component: Trac | Version:

Re: How to start with testing??

2010-11-01 Thread Michael Cronenworth
xcieja wrote: > I have just joined Fedora Community, and i would like to ask how does > testing look here ?? > Can anyone focus on the part he/she is interested in and test it or is > there any person who take care, prepares test cases and assigns people > to tests ?? > Is there any guide describin

How to start with testing??

2010-11-01 Thread xcieja
Hello, I have just joined Fedora Community, and i would like to ask how does testing look here ?? Can anyone focus on the part he/she is interested in and test it or is there any person who take care, prepares test cases and assigns people to tests ?? Is there any guide describing such process h

Re: Fresh install, no network

2010-11-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:16 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > BTW the Live CD has exactly the same problem. I don't understand why > > people aren't screaming about this. It's a very ordinary machine with > > very standard hardware. >

Re: Devices (was Re: Preupgrade change?)

2010-11-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 19:19 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > That might be the case in the US, its not the case in the UK and > Australia where I use 3G for everything from video streaming and VoIP > to remote access work related things with no issues at all. try it on a train from London to Manche

Re: Devices (was Re: Preupgrade change?)

2010-11-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 13:26 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > The N900 is unfortunately impractical in territories with no 1700 or > > 2100 band providers (or poor ones). > > For 3G, yes, but I live with 2.5G service as I'm almost always near a > WLAN AP. (I don't hav

Re: Devices (was Re: Preupgrade change?)

2010-11-01 Thread Peter Robinson
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: >> The N900 is unfortunately impractical in territories with no 1700 or >> 2100 band providers (or poor ones). > > For 3G, yes, but I live with 2.5G service as I'm almost always near a > WLAN AP. (I don't have 1700

Re: Fedora 13 updates-testing report

2010-11-01 Thread Michael Cronenworth
upda...@fedoraproject.org wrote: > > The following Fedora 13 Critical Path updates have yet to be approved: > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nss-3.12.7-4.fc13,nss-util-3.12.7-2.fc13,nss-softokn-3.12.7-3.fc13,nspr-4.8.6-1.fc13 This update needs to be removed from bodhi. -- test

Re: Devices (was Re: Preupgrade change?)

2010-11-01 Thread Jan Wildeboer
Oops. I meant correct use of the "refers-to" header. Thread completeness relying *only* on refers-to is based on an incorrect assumption that refers-to is compulsory and not optional. IMHO. Jan -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma

Re: Devices (was Re: Preupgrade change?)

2010-11-01 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Adam Williamson wrote: > The N900 is unfortunately impractical in territories with no 1700 or > 2100 band providers (or poor ones). For 3G, yes, but I live with 2.5G service as I'm almost always near a WLAN AP. (I don't have 1700 or 2100 service near me). The N900 should be able to provide voice

Re: Devices (was Re: Preupgrade change?)

2010-11-01 Thread Jan Wildeboer
And as a closing one for OT stuff - the correct use of reply-to is unfortunately optional in the RFC. I knew all of this hence my excuse. Still noone has reacted to the point I raised. But as at least one person on this list values thraed-completeness over content, I gather it is better to simp

Devices (was Re: Preupgrade change?)

2010-11-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 13:04 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Jan Wildeboer wrote: > > (Sorry for top-posting, blame blackberry and me) > > ... and it broke the thread. You should tell your employer to provide > you a more FOSS friendly device (a.k.a. Nokia N900). The N900 is unfortunately imp

Re: NVidia Driver question???

2010-11-01 Thread Göran Uddeborg
Adam Williamson: > ... and PM is rather more complex > than a 'silly little detail' ... :-) Don't get me wrong. I meant it was a silly detail for me as a user. I can easily imagine it might be quite complex on the implementation side. > ... nouveau team is currently > working to implement po

Re: Preupgrade change?

2010-11-01 Thread Fabian A. Scherschel
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 7:04 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Jan Wildeboer wrote: > > (Sorry for top-posting, blame blackberry and me) > > ... and it broke the thread. You should tell your employer to provide > you a more FOSS friendly device (a.k.a. Nokia N900). > > LOL, yeah! What kind of a fre

Re: Preupgrade change?

2010-11-01 Thread Michael Cronenworth
Jan Wildeboer wrote: > (Sorry for top-posting, blame blackberry and me) ... and it broke the thread. You should tell your employer to provide you a more FOSS friendly device (a.k.a. Nokia N900). -- test mailing list test@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma

Re: critpath test request: libdrm 2.4.22-1

2010-11-01 Thread Peter Robinson
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libdrm-2.4.22-1.fc14 > > Prerequisite for intel 2.13.0, which is a pretty nice pile of bugfixes > itself. It seems the libdrm got into F-14, what ever happened to the newer intel driver? It doesn't seem

Re: Firefox 3.6.12-1 Not Stable

2010-11-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sat, 2010-10-30 at 21:51 +0530, Sawrub wrote: > On 10/30/2010 03:37 PM, cornel panceac wrote: > > > > > > 2010/10/30 Sawrub > > The latest firefox.x86_64 [3.6.12-1.fc14] pushed out seems > > to be > > having some issues, have hung my system twice, as of now. > >

Re: upgrade to Rawhide yum errors/warnings

2010-11-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 22:09 -0400, Thomas Belvin wrote: > I just upgraded from F14 updates-testing to Rawhide and got these > errors/warnings in yum. > Are any of these critical? At a glance, doesn't look like it. > Installing : libgnomekbd-2.91.1-2.fc15.i686 > 536/180

Re: Fresh install, no network

2010-11-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:16 -0430, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > BTW the Live CD has exactly the same problem. I don't understand why > people aren't screaming about this. It's a very ordinary machine with > very standard hardware. Just in case subsequent discussion didn't render it obvious, peopl

Re: Preupgrade change?

2010-11-01 Thread Jan Wildeboer
(Sorry for top-posting, blame blackberry and me) IMHO - if preupgrade doesn't work for those running F13 - it would be a blocker for F14 release IMHO. Jan - Original Message - From: test-boun...@lists.fedoraproject.org To: For testers of Fedora development releases Sent: Mon Nov 01

Re: Fresh install, no network

2010-11-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 13:35 +0100, net wrote: > HI, > I have the same problem, only slightly different system. > Interesting may be that dmesg |grep eth0 comes up with > "no ipv6 routers found" > Googling gave no insight. > Is this a kernel error message? > Henk It's a normal message and not the

Re: NVidia Driver question???

2010-11-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 21:56 +0100, Göran Uddeborg wrote: > Bruno Wolff III: > > Try Nouveau first and if that works for you, stick with that. > > One silly detail when using the Nouveau drivers rather than nVidia's > is that only the latter does speed regulation of the graphic card's > fan. Is an

Re: Preupgrade change?

2010-11-01 Thread Adam Williamson
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:26 +, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 30 October 2010 19:48, Paul Frields wrote: > > * > > https://fedorahosted.org/preupgrade/changeset?new=data%40d42e6189dbe4ad7591d422f200a31ad196125dcc&old=data%404157e81ce428be819a957a31be5a19bcc6bd2efe > > Shouldn't Rawhide always st

Re: Preupgrade change?

2010-11-01 Thread seth vidal
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 11:21 -0400, James Laska wrote: > On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 11:11 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:26 +, Richard Hughes wrote: > > > On 30 October 2010 19:48, Paul Frields wrote: > > > > * > > > > https://fedorahosted.org/preupgrade/changeset?new=data%40

Re: Preupgrade change?

2010-11-01 Thread James Laska
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 11:11 -0400, seth vidal wrote: > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:26 +, Richard Hughes wrote: > > On 30 October 2010 19:48, Paul Frields wrote: > > > * > > > https://fedorahosted.org/preupgrade/changeset?new=data%40d42e6189dbe4ad7591d422f200a31ad196125dcc&old=data%404157e81ce428

Re: Preupgrade change?

2010-11-01 Thread seth vidal
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 19:26 +, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 30 October 2010 19:48, Paul Frields wrote: > > * > > https://fedorahosted.org/preupgrade/changeset?new=data%40d42e6189dbe4ad7591d422f200a31ad196125dcc&old=data%404157e81ce428be819a957a31be5a19bcc6bd2efe > > Shouldn't Rawhide always st

Re: selinux and file system check

2010-11-01 Thread Daniel J Walsh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/01/2010 03:04 AM, cornel panceac wrote: > 2010/11/1 cornel panceac > >> >> >> 2010/10/29 Daniel J Walsh >> >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> On 10/29/2010 02:48 AM, cornel panceac wrote: why is the selinux

2010-11-01 - No QA meeting planned

2010-11-01 Thread James Laska
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2010-11-01 # Time: 15:00 UTC (11:00 EDT, 16:00 CET) [1] # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings gang, I have no planned topics for a meeting today. Please keep up the great work in discussion F-14 issues encountered. Your discussion h

Re: Fresh install, no network

2010-11-01 Thread net
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010 19:16:28 -0430 "Patrick O'Callaghan" wrote: > I just did a fresh install of F14-RC1 (i.e. the gold version, x86_64) > with default options and have no network. My F13 system on the same > h/w and net had no problems. This is a bog-standard wired Ethernet > using DHCP to a Belk

Re: F14 - Changing GDM Background

2010-11-01 Thread Saurabh Sharma
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 1:48 PM, cornel panceac wrote: > > > 2010/10/31 Sawrub >> >>  Hello All, >> >> Setting default GDM background was a little easy till F12 by using the >> 'Set as Default' button, but i can't see it there now in F14. Please >> rescue me to change it. > > never tried in fedora

Re: selinux and file system check

2010-11-01 Thread Richard Ryniker
>> For the update / selinux relabel issue, if you write to file systems >> with selinux disabled that is going to trigger needing a relabel. > >this happens without any writing (that i know about) occuring. just enter >and exit rescue mode, with the partition(s) mounted rw. If you mount the file s

Re: Fresh install, no network

2010-11-01 Thread Patrick O'Callaghan
On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 23:43 -0400, Gregory Woodbury wrote: > From: > Gregory Woodbury > >To: > For testers of Fedora development > releases > > Subject: > Re: Fresh install, no network >

rawhide report: 20101101 changes

2010-11-01 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Mon Nov 1 08:15:05 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.i686 requires libvala-0.10.so.0 1:anjuta-2.31.90.0-3.fc15.x86_64 requires libvala-0.10.so.0()(64bit) apcupsd-3.14.8-3.

Re: Fresh install, no network

2010-11-01 Thread cornel panceac
2010/11/1 Patrick O'Callaghan > I just did a fresh install of F14-RC1 (i.e. the gold version, x86_64) > with default options and have no network. My F13 system on the same h/w > and net had no problems. This is a bog-standard wired Ethernet using > DHCP to a Belkin hub. The net itself is fine as

Re: F14 - Changing GDM Background

2010-11-01 Thread cornel panceac
2010/10/31 Sawrub > Hello All, > > Setting default GDM background was a little easy till F12 by using the > 'Set as Default' button, but i can't see it there now in F14. Please > rescue me to change it. > never tried in fedora but this worked in ubuntu: http://www.ubuntugeek.com/how-do-you-cha

Re: selinux and file system check

2010-11-01 Thread cornel panceac
2010/10/29 Bruno Wolff III > On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 17:35:54 +0300, > cornel panceac wrote: > > > not yet, if possible i'll create a bug tomorrow. the behaviour is like > > this: i boot rescue environment, maybe yum update the system to be > rescued, > > then reboot on the then reboot. ""Super

Re: selinux and file system check

2010-11-01 Thread cornel panceac
2010/11/1 cornel panceac > > > 2010/10/29 Daniel J Walsh > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 10/29/2010 02:48 AM, cornel panceac wrote: >> > why is the selinux relabel required when the "Superblock last >> mount/write is >> > in the future" error is fixed? >> > >> >

Re: selinux and file system check

2010-11-01 Thread cornel panceac
2010/10/29 Daniel J Walsh > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/29/2010 02:48 AM, cornel panceac wrote: > > why is the selinux relabel required when the "Superblock last mount/write > is > > in the future" error is fixed? > > > > > No clue. Who says it is? Do you have a bu