Re: [Fedora QA] #152: Test Cases Management

#152: Test Cases Management --+- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 15 Component: Wiki

Re: config date

On 2011/01/04 00:09 (GMT-0500) Michal Jaegermann composed: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:53:04PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: >> Maybe the problem is that systemd doesn't know about any of this. > I do not think that systemd is supposed to know anything about your > time zone; I may miss something.

Re: config date

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 10:53:04PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > > Maybe the problem is that systemd doesn't know about any of this. I do not think that systemd is supposed to know anything about your time zone; I may miss something. > According to chkconfig, ntpd is on, ntpd is designed to give

Re: config date

On 2011/01/03 18:18 (GMT-0700) Michal Jaegermann composed: > Felix Miata wrote: >> Is there another cmdline date configuration tool? > system-config-date is doing more than just setting a time zone but > if you want to do only that then there are many such tools and one > possible is known as '

Re: config date

On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 18:43 -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2011/01/03 18:33 (GMT-0500) Paolo Galtieri composed: > > > On 01/03/11 18:55, Felix Miata wrote: > > >> Is there another cmdline date configuration tool? system-config-date > >> seems to > >> require X (depends on gnome-python2-canvas;

Re: config date

On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 05:55:29PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > Is there another cmdline date configuration tool? system-config-date is doing more than just setting a time zone but if you want to do only that then there are many such tools and one possible is known as '/bin/cp'. Just copy a desire

Re: config date

On 01/03/11 19:43, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2011/01/03 18:33 (GMT-0500) Paolo Galtieri composed: > >> On 01/03/11 18:55, Felix Miata wrote: > >>> Is there another cmdline date configuration tool? system-config-date >>> seems to >>> require X (depends on gnome-python2-canvas; RuntimeError: could

Re: config date

On 2011/01/03 18:33 (GMT-0500) Paolo Galtieri composed: > On 01/03/11 18:55, Felix Miata wrote: >> Is there another cmdline date configuration tool? system-config-date seems >> to >> require X (depends on gnome-python2-canvas; RuntimeError: could not open >> display), which ATM will not start

Re: config date

On 01/03/11 18:55, Felix Miata wrote: > Is there another cmdline date configuration tool? system-config-date seems to > require X (depends on gnome-python2-canvas; RuntimeError: could not open > display), which ATM will not start on my system, while each boot corrupts the > time in the amount of th

config date

Is there another cmdline date configuration tool? system-config-date seems to require X (depends on gnome-python2-canvas; RuntimeError: could not open display), which ATM will not start on my system, while each boot corrupts the time in the amount of the TZ offset. -- "How much better to get wi

Re: [Fedora QA] #152: Test Cases Management

#152: Test Cases Management --+- Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major| Milestone: Fedora 15 Component: Wiki

Fedora 13 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libwmf-0.2.8.4-22.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordpress-2.8.6-3.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbus-1.2.24-2.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/pe

Fedora 14 updates-testing report

The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libwmf-0.2.8.4-27.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/wordpress-2.8.6-3.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/collectd-4.9.4-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates

2011-01-03 - Fedora QA meeting recap

Minutes and IRC transcript available at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings/20110103 = Attendees = People present (lines said) * jlaska (127) * adamw (37) * Viking-Ice (23) * kparal (18) * rbergeron (4) * jskladan_home (3) * wwoods (2) Unable to

Re: cannot boot beyond runlevel 1

On 01/03/2011 11:55 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Michal Jaegermann (mic...@harddata.com) said: >>> To be clear, as I alluded to in my previous replies, none of my (100+) OS >>> installations has rhgb or quiet on any kernel line in any stanza I ever use, >> >> Then I am at loss how to explain that y

Re: cannot boot beyond runlevel 1

Michal Jaegermann (mic...@harddata.com) said: > > To be clear, as I alluded to in my previous replies, none of my (100+) OS > > installations has rhgb or quiet on any kernel line in any stanza I ever > > use, > > Then I am at loss how to explain that you may miss "Press 'I' to > enter interact

Re: cannot boot beyond runlevel 1

On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 06:37:34PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2011/01/02 15:25 (GMT-0700) Michal Jaegermann composed: > > > On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 04:53:49PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > > >> How & when do I get into interactive startup, > > > See the previous replies but remember to put "3

Re: cannot boot beyond runlevel 1

On Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 10:08:47PM -0500, Felix Miata wrote: > On 2011/01/02 23:54 (GMT-0300) Horst H. von Brand composed: > > > Michal Jaegermann wrote: > > >> So something else is blocking you although this looks somewhat > >> puzzling. Maybe systemd is indeed a culprit? Maybe something el

Re: [Fedora QA] #158: Proposed Test Day - l10n/i18n test day

#158: Proposed Test Day - l10n/i18n test day ---+ Reporter: rhe | Owner: rhe Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 15 Component: Test Day | V

Re: Package-specific test case and critical path test case project: drafts for review

On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 14:35 +, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 17:11 +, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Hi, everyone. So, in the recent debate about the update process it again > > became clear that we were lacking a good process for providing > > package-specific test instruction

Re: Package-specific test case and critical path test case project: drafts for review

On Wed, 2010-12-22 at 17:29 +, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-21 at 18:12 -0500, James Laska wrote: > > > > the first isn't particularly specific to this, but it was a prerequisite > > > that I discovered was missing: it's a guide to test case creation in > > > general, explaining th

2011-01-03 @ ** 16:00 UTC ** - Fedora QA meeting

# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2011-01-03 # Time: 16:00 UTC (11:00 EST, 17:00 CET) [1] # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Happy new year! With the exception of several dedicated testers, things have been quiet over the last two weeks. I trust folks were able to enjoy som

Re: F14 cpuspeed / ondemand broken?

On 01/03/2011 02:36 PM, Christoph Frieben wrote: Bug 49 has not been marked a duplicate of whatsoever. Moreover it's active since its status is "NEW" and not "CLOSED". ~C Comment 3 *** Duplicate of bug 505837

Re: F14 cpuspeed / ondemand broken?

2011/1/3 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson": > Now under normal circumstances Matthew Garret or some other kernel > maintainer would have asked you to add to your report, the output from > acpidump but given that this has been incorrectly triaged and marked as a > duplicated of bug 50837 which was filed again

Re: F14 cpuspeed / ondemand broken?

On 01/03/2011 01:29 PM, Steven Haigh wrote: What I don't understand is that if the CPU supports ACPI, the mainboard supports ACPI, why can't we throttle the CPU using ACPI? As I have mentioned several most likely cause is the BIOS either not configured to do so or unable to do so.. INTEL has

Re: F14 cpuspeed / ondemand broken?

On 01/01/2011 09:43 PM, Steven Haigh wrote: To be honest, I looked through all the screens of the BIOS and I can't see anything that may affect this. As the ONLY defaults option available is optimal, I gave it a go;) Unfortunately it might not be that obvious which BIOS knob(s) need to be turn

Re: F14 cpuspeed / ondemand broken?

On 4/01/2011 12:29 AM, Steven Haigh wrote: > On 4/01/2011 12:08 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 08:49 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: >> >>> I wish I could find the site where I got this information as my >>> recollection of it is a bit hazy but part of your problem may be that >>> t

Re: F14 cpuspeed / ondemand broken?

On 4/01/2011 12:08 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 08:49 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> I wish I could find the site where I got this information as my >> recollection of it is a bit hazy but part of your problem may be that >> the p4-clockmod and ondemand are more or less incom

Re: F14 cpuspeed / ondemand broken?

On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 08:49 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > >> I wish I could find the site where I got this information as my >> recollection of it is a bit hazy but part of your problem may be that >> the p4-clockmod and ondemand are more or

Re: cannot boot beyond runlevel 1

On Sun, 2011-01-02 at 11:37 -0700, Michal Jaegermann wrote: > So what should be next? Check a listing of /etc/rc.d/rc3.d/S* to > find what you configured. Are you sure that the previous step > really finished? Answering such questions is much easier if you are > running that explicitely instead

Re: F14 cpuspeed / ondemand broken?

On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 08:49 -0600, Richard Shaw wrote: > I wish I could find the site where I got this information as my > recollection of it is a bit hazy but part of your problem may be that > the p4-clockmod and ondemand are more or less incompatible. I remember > reading something on kerneltra

rawhide report: 20110103 changes

Compose started at Mon Jan 3 08:15:06 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- apvlv-0.0.9.8-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libpoppler.so.9()(64bit) bacula-director-mysql-5.0.3-6.fc15.x86_64 requires libmysqlclient_r.so.16()(64bit)

New BugZapper Introduction

Hi all, My name is Mike (Michiel Beijen officially, but no-one outside The Netherlands can pronounce that correctly, so just Mike will do fine). I work for OTRS (http://www.otrs.com) - the company behind the open source help desk software with the same name. I recently switched to Fedora 14 on my