Re: random idea: QA group identi.ca account

2011-02-04 Thread Gerard Braad
Hi, On 2/5/11, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 18:25 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> You should redirect to marketing list. Nobody here has access to it > I did post to marketing ML on Tue/Wed (I forget which, the last week has > been kind of a blur) asking people to promote the T

Re: rawhide report: 20110204 changes

2011-02-04 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 14:44:57 -0500, Brian wrote: > Correct, applets aren't supported in GNOME 3, and these applet's > should probably be retired in their rawhide branches. I just did this > yesterday for the contact-lookup-applet. Great. I've retired gnome-applet-netspeed, too. GNOME Shell "fallb

Fedora 13 updates-testing report

2011-02-04 Thread updates
The following Fedora 13 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/dbus-1.2.24-2.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/subversion-1.6.15-1.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/openoffice.org-3.2.0-12.35.fc13 https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 14 updates-testing report

2011-02-04 Thread updates
The following Fedora 14 Security updates need testing: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/util-linux-ng-2.18-4.8.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/feh-1.10.1-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/socat-1.7.1.3-1.fc14 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/

Re: rawhide report: 20110204 changes

2011-02-04 Thread Bill Nottingham
Michael Schwendt (mschwe...@gmail.com) said: > > gnome-applet-bubblemon-2.0.15-1.fc13.x86_64 requires > > libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) > > gnome-applet-cpufire-1.6-3.fc14.x86_64 requires > > libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) > > gnome-applet-globalmenu-0.7.9-1.fc15.x86_64 requires

Re: rawhide report: 20110204 changes

2011-02-04 Thread Brian Pepple
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote: > What are gnome-applet packagers supposed to do here? > A thread on desktop list suggests that panel applets won't be supported > anymore. Correct, applets aren't supported in GNOME 3, and these applet's should probably be retired in their

Re: Unable to properly test Gnome 3 during test day

2011-02-04 Thread Michael Schwendt
> does it affect desktops other than gnome? if so, probably something > else. that definitely does the trick for me, though. Yes, it's the same with XFCE - now that I've tried. Linked below is the X log from my startx into XFCE: http://mschwendt.fedorapeople.org/Xorg.0.log-2

Re: rawhide report: 20110204 changes

2011-02-04 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011 13:27:50 +, Rawhide wrote: > gnome-applet-bubblemon-2.0.15-1.fc13.x86_64 requires > libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) > gnome-applet-cpufire-1.6-3.fc14.x86_64 requires > libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) > gnome-applet-globalmenu-0.7.9-1.fc15.x86_64 requires

Re: NOPL instruction back in Rawhide?

2011-02-04 Thread Bill Nottingham
Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said: > >> I re-opened the old bug and linked it against F15Alpha blocker bug > >> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579838 > > > > The Version should be "rawhide". I was surprised that the Component was > > changed > > from glibc to binutils -

Re: Unable to properly test Gnome 3 during test day

2011-02-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 20:12 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:47:46 -0800, Adam wrote: > > > On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 20:46 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > > After updating Rawhide, I notice Gnome 3 (mutter) constantly crash when > > > pressing Alt+Tab or entering an input o

Re: Unable to properly test Gnome 3 during test day

2011-02-04 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Thu, 03 Feb 2011 21:47:46 -0800, Adam wrote: > On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 20:46 -0800, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote: > > After updating Rawhide, I notice Gnome 3 (mutter) constantly crash when > > pressing Alt+Tab or entering an input on search on computer field. > > Affected applications are GTK based.

Re: NOPL instruction back in Rawhide?

2011-02-04 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: > Peter Robinson gmail.com> writes: > >> I re-opened the old bug and linked it against F15Alpha blocker bug >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579838 > > The Version should be "rawhide". I was surprised that the Component was >

Re: random idea: QA group identi.ca account

2011-02-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 18:25 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Gerard Braad > wrote: > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 08:54 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > >> We do.

Re: where is the test day page?

2011-02-04 Thread Adam Williamson
On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 21:47 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > To be honest, I don't think test days are meant for random end users > and we shouldn't push this to them and certainly not in preference > over alpha or beta releases. Testers and people who have enough > knowledge to figure out the de

NOPL instruction back in Rawhide?

2011-02-04 Thread Andre Robatino
Peter Robinson gmail.com> writes: > I re-opened the old bug and linked it against F15Alpha blocker bug > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579838 The Version should be "rawhide". I was surprised that the Component was changed from glibc to binutils - do you know if this is correct,

Re: where is the test day page?

2011-02-04 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:54 PM, cornel pancea wrote: > >> thank you, but, there's no easy way to find this, isn't it? > after you have to ^f to find the wiki link on the main page, you have to > ^f to find quality assurance on the wiki page, ("qa" is not there (as a > string)) and that assumes y

Re: NOPL instruction back in Rawhide?

2011-02-04 Thread Peter Robinson
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Andre Robatino (robat...@fedoraproject.org) said: >> Checking recent Koji glibc.i686 builds, the latest one (2.13.90-1 for Rawhide >> from Jan. 25) appears to be the only one with the problem. The two earlier >> builds (2.12.90-21.fc15 for R

Re: NOPL instruction back in Rawhide?

2011-02-04 Thread Bill Nottingham
Andre Robatino (robat...@fedoraproject.org) said: > Checking recent Koji glibc.i686 builds, the latest one (2.13.90-1 for Rawhide > from Jan. 25) appears to be the only one with the problem. The two earlier > builds (2.12.90-21.fc15 for Rawhide from Dec. 21, and 2.13-1 for F14 from Jan. > 20) don'

rawhide report: 20110204 changes

2011-02-04 Thread Rawhide Report
Compose started at Fri Feb 4 08:15:10 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- almanah-0.7.3-6.fc15.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.22()(64bit) almanah-0.7.3-6.fc15.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-1.2.so.11()(64bit) balsa-

Re: random idea: QA group identi.ca account

2011-02-04 Thread Rahul Sundaram
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Gerard Braad wrote: > On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 08:54 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > >> We do. http://identi.ca/fedora reposted to http://twitter.com/fedora > > cool. why does it not have a GNOME test day

Re: random idea: QA group identi.ca account

2011-02-04 Thread Gerard Braad
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 08:54 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> We do.   http://identi.ca/fedora  reposted to http://twitter.com/fedora > cool. why does it not have a GNOME test day announcement?! :) Which is a very good question! I have only

Re: Unable to properly test Gnome 3 during test day

2011-02-04 Thread Christoph Frieben
2011/2/4 Luya Tshimbalanga: > After updating Rawhide, I notice Gnome 3 (mutter) constantly crash when > pressing Alt+Tab or entering an input on search on computer field. No problems when using the latest builds from Koji including mutter-2.91.6-2.fc15 . ~C -- test mailing list test@lists.fedorap